User talk:Juliusfriedman

Welcome!

Hello, Juliusfriedman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sub Versioning, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tinton5 (talk) 03:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Sub Versioning


The article Sub Versioning has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:Not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tinton5 (talk) 03:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sub7 has been reverted. Your edit here to Sub7 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/juliusrfriedman) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julius Richard Friedman


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Julius Richard Friedman, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ben Ben (talk) 19:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sub7. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julius Richard Friedman


A tag has been placed on Julius Richard Friedman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 20:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles in Wikipedia
Hi Julius,

Thanks for your interest in the project. However the article you created about yourself was deleted. Wikipedia needs to have reliable sources for everything included in the project, and those sources have to be published. In general, articles also need to be about fairly famous people. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --TeaDrinker (talk) 03:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

What type of verification do you require and in what form can the be linked in the media? Are you available for a telephone call at this hour? 11:44 PM EST 3-24-12

As I have reviewed and found just the first sentence: 'Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views' to be ambiguous and just incoherent in it's initial perception then I would like to rebut by stating that any article which can be published by said source can also promote either willingly, knowingly and intelligently through course of his own free will or lack thereof or otherwise state-able et al.

Anything else?

Do I really have to start a lawsuit to prove a point in this world?

X


 * Alas, no, I am not available for a telephone call. References will need to be published sources such as newspapers, television programs, books, journal articles, etc. See reliable source guideline for additional information.  That information should not merely demonstrate facts are true, but also that the subject of the article (you) are famous.  Finally, let me also note that it is generally frowned upon to edit with a conflict of interest, such as creating an autobiography.  I hope your last sentence was not a legal threat; that would result in an immediate block.  Hope this helps, --TeaDrinker (talk) 03:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 03:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Additionally I am going to sleep now and would sincerely appreciate the article restored in exact formation (Including the family data which serves as both a citation and a reference).

P.S. The Weed helps and you can't deny it! (And I don't need a secret identity)

And the above is regardless if my editing capabilities are restored or otherwise.

TIA,

Jay