User talk:Julyattitude/sandbox

I understand what Amelia was saying about the lead, and I agree that the sentences she listed appear to have little relevance to the content. I believe she made a good decision, and the 72 percent figure may not be so significant. Nana byun (talk) 20:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey. I've reviewed your proposed changes to the 'Social Media as News Sources' article. You mentioned that you were trying to balance out the first section of the article (after the lead). I've compared the version histories and it looks like you're tweaking/adding in some good information. You also wanted feedback on how the fragment "allow people without professional journalistic backgrounds to create news and cover events that news agencies might not cover" sounded. Personally, it reads to me as pretty even handed as statements of facts. So as long as the sources check out, you should be all set with that. The only minor criticism I have is you use of "often or sometimes" in the lead. I think you should pick one or the other, or perhaps swap them both out for 'frequently.' Anyway, that's all I have. Good luck continuing to edit! Civil Protection Team 9 (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)