User talk:Jumber

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. ''Your edits of this article, whilst assumed for to be assumed good faith, do not adhere to the NPOV policy. Intentional or not, replacing supposed Russian propaganda with unreferenced propaganda which from tone takes a vehement anti-Russian view, will be challenged, and removed.'' Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 03:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Bogorm (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2008 (EET)

Blocked
You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on 2008 South Ossetia war. It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place below. Tiptoety talk 20:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Original research
Hi. Please read over one of wikipedias core policies, WP:OR. Basically what this policy means is that every single thing you add to an article must be directly from a reliable source. You can't just change words around and add things or remove things based on your own personal knowledge and point of view. Doing so will end up in lots of hard work going to waste due to being reverted. Also look over WP:NPOV. It's very important to keep these core policies in mind when making edits. For example, adding things like "Russian propaganda insists that the region suffered heavy shelling", or changing the word "accounts" to "rumors" in contrast to what the source says is not acceptable by any means. Thanks! LokiiT (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)