User talk:Jumbuck22

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Madchester 22:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please do not vandalise an editor's user page. Thanks. --Madchester 03:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

MY REPSONSE: Understood. However, let me just say that I understand the reprimand for my actions, but with that being said, why is the listing for Dusty Baker still allowed to be posted? It is filled with factual inaccuracies, comments taken out of context and out-and-out lies. I have previously posted counter-points complete with citable references on the page to try and balance out the biography, but it was removed. The complete recap is available on the Discussion page for Dusty Baker. Please review these, and you'll see why this article is in violation of Wikipedia policy in numerous areas. If I am to be reprimanded for writing a lucid response while the biased article is allowed to remain is unreasonable and irresponsible.