User talk:Jumpingjacksparrow

http://www.derok.net/images/entertainment/captain%20jack%20sparrow.jpg

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Jumpingjacksparrow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Universe
While true that the Big Crunch is a proposed explanation, it is certainly does not have consensus about it being the ultimate fate of the universe. I have undone your edits, as I feel this is best left for the article on the Ultimate fate of the universe / Big Crunch itself. If you disagree, we can talk about it here or at Talk:Universe. Looking forward to see you around. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

''Thank you. I changed my edits to include that fact. I think it is important that Wikipedia users are provided all the information that is out there.''Jumpingjacksparrow
 * Your addition to the article is completely misguided. The Big Crunch hypothesis posits that the Universe will contract at some point in the future (leading to similar conditions to the Big Bang). The contraction of the Universe couldn't create habitable conditions on the Earth or block any radiation - to the contrary, it would lead to an increase of the temperature of the Universe. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)