User talk:Jumpulse

The following could be one of the most authoritative comments based on the paper by the Father of Chinese Physics, Ta-You Wu, on jumpulse related to infinite acceleration or jerk, which has become one of the most common questions on the web by physics students and professors.

It is difficult to visualize an infinite accelerating, but an infinite acceleration can be integrated to get a step function of velocity vs. time. An approximate step function of velocity vs. time is called an impulse. However, according to the theory of relativity, nothing can move faster than the speed of light (still questioned by post-science http://www.postscience.com). Thus, there cannot be an infinite acceleration. Also, the infinite acceleration for a finite mass needs infinite energy, which is not possible. The important question should be about an infinite jerk, which is the rate of change of acceleration. An infinite jerk can produce a step function of force vs. time when it is integrated over time. The step function of force vs. time is called a jumpulse, a word coined by the Father of Chinese Physics Ta-You Wu with two Nobel Prize winning students. The historical paper defining jumpulse by Ta-You Wu:

http://psroc.phys.ntu.edu.tw/cjp/v37/531.pdf

What is even more important is the relevance of jumpulse. Jumpulse is necessary in creating a collision without bounce, commonly known as touch.

Jumpulse could become the most famous new word; it is related to (1) Jumpulse Dance, which has started a world-wide dance movement by reviving the Shufflin, (2) Jumpulse Stroke, which is the secret of consistency in sports and has shifted the domination of tennis from USA to Europe, and (3) Jumpulse Mechanism, which is the solution of touch.

Japanese Sixth Generation Computer was Robotics. It failed because robot could not touch. Jumpulse is necessary in creating a collision without bounce, commonly known as touch.

The Jumpulse Mechanism generates a finite force by removing one of two opposing forces. Non-expandable springs and collapsible springs can be used to build spacecraft docking and landing mechanisms, active automobile shock absorbers, which can eliminate all bounces, and robotic touch mechanism.

Jumpulse empirical evidence web links (1) The first video below demonstrates a professional tennis player hitting a backhand with the racket moves faster than the ball. (2) The second video is a historically first demonstration of the Jumpulse Mechanism, where after colliding, two cars are in prolonged contact. (3) The third video is a demonstration of the Jumpulse Dance. 	http://japanontop.com/view.php?video=2vSYxgbRhD8&title=Juan+Mart%C3%ADn+del+Potro+Two-Handed+Jumpulse+Backhand+Stroke 	http://japanontop.com/view.php?video=PixwnjvNlNQ&title=Prolonged+Contact+Based+on+a+Mechnical+Jumpulse+Mechanism 	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsHcpe_oiI8

post-science
Hi Jumpulse. I (among others) would appreciate it if you could stop posting your post-science/jumpulse/infinite-spreadsheet content. It has been removed time and again by various editors as irrelevant at best. I'm not entirely whether or not you believe in everything that you write although I'm certain that you're trolling when you make edits about jumpulse as a dance movement (see this clear example of vandalism). Another clear example of deliberate disruption is this where you revert your own additions with the rationale "Please get permission before posting post-science materials". In the future, I urge you to discuss any edits that have to do with this topic on the talk page of the article. Wikipedia's science articles are based on research published in well-established peer-reviewed publications, funded by well-established research institutes (that does not include the Post-Science Institute) or published by well-established experts (that doesn't include Hugh Ching). While I'm sure you'll retort that Ta-You Wu is a respected expert, the fact is that a) this was a letter, not an article, b) there's something fishy about a letter not written by the author that uses a non-existent institute as affiliation (for Mr. Ching), c) fifteen years after the fact, no physics paper has ever found the need to use the notion of jumpulse. Pichpich (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)