User talk:Junaidramzan

January 2012
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Junaidramzan. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Qnet, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Qnet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  22:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk you are not making any kind of sense and wondering how you have been honored as top contributor for wiki. ironic!!!

Editing Qnet wikipage
Hi, I request you to kindly communicate the reason why you are changing the content on the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) — Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for... Advertising. All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. See also Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  22:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Agree to the statement that the topics must be verifiable with independent 3rd party source... so please verify and explain to us what information is biased as mentioned... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) — Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The amount of actual information was totally overwhelmed by the flood of advertising spew. Language like ""fastest-growing online shopping and business community"" (it's a company, not a community); "millions of successful distributors"; "packed with exclusive lifestyle brands for a healthy, happy life"; "to enrich the lives of customers through its innovative products its business opportunity to work for themselves and even give back to the community"; "constantly evolving group has also expanded organically into various new segments through strategic investments"; "encompasses all aspects of business, using the internet as its modality bringing products and services from all points of the globe to the customer wherever he or she may be"; and "expansion into high-quality interrelated businesses, products and services has created many new opportunities for their customers"! This is not how normal human beings write, this is how copywriters spin a giant MLM plan, as if it were somehow a public service! -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  22:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)