User talk:Jungen87/sandbox

I'll start by discussing your edits to the "Species Translocation" article. As I was reading the article before your edits, it felt like the specific paragraphs in the "Three Types" subcategory were missing a main theme statement. It seems like they define the type of species translocation and then start by going into various examples or leave out examples entirely. That's why I like your first statement on introduction translocation been used for biological control, which is linked. I would suggest giving a basic definition of biological control and tying that in to what's been stated in the article already. I would also establish this theme early on in this particular paragraph which can be supported by the subsequent statements. In the second edit, this statement seems like a strong supporting theme statement to species re-introduction which can have examples associated with it. I would suggest any solid examples that you could find would greatly add support to this paragraph, because the article introduces reasons why re-introduction is important and why populations have gone extinct in certain habitats, so you could provide cases where there have been significant attempts (whether good or bad) of species re-introduction. You might also consider "linking" the terms "ecological community," etc. The third edit concerning "rewilding" is a statement that should come at the end of the paragraph (albeit a small one). The section opens up with translocations from the 1973-1989, and then leaves it with that information. There have been so many changes in policy and attention to species translocation in recent years which you addressed, so I would suggest any information on the number of translocations from the past decade would be good supporting data to this section, to draw comparisons between the last 30-40 years. For your additional section on "Translocation Success," I believe this subsection should be added to the main article because there already exists the "Reasons for Failure" subsection. In terms of placement of this subsection, you could either put it before the "Reasons for Failure" section, or afterward (your personal preference). Personally, I would put it before the "Reasons for Failure" and after the "Western Shield" section, because the "Western Shield" translocation does have success associated with it, and you could build off those statements with your success story examples in North America. I would only add maybe a little more clarification and information on the gray wolf translocation as to why that was necessary (without going into the hard details because you linked to another article). Overall, I feel like these edits and additions will give more strength and clarity to this article.Kvkaplan (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Nice review Kramer - you make some good points, which I could not given the topic. I agree that some more examples and the trends section does seem very out of date. Any information to update that or put it in historical perspective would be good. It just seems odd to only supply info to 1989.Marciaharrison (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)