User talk:JungleeDOc

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cheers! Stella BATPHONE GROOVES  00:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 20:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

additional information
I declined your submission for the second time. There are three basic reasons:

1. The article is highly promotional, containing material of interest only to prospective members and perhaps their patients. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective client or members --that sort of content is considered promotional. You are  thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

2. There are no references from outside third party sources to show the notability. WP articles must have providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Someone outside the Board itself must have written about them.

3. it contains extensive language copied from the web site, shich is never permitted--it's a copyright violation. To use the material they must  explicitly license the rights to the material according to our licensing, using the CC-BY-SA  and the GNU  licenses, as explained in WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:Donating copyrighted materials; be aware that these licenses  give everyone in the world an irrevocable license to reuse and alter the material, even for commercial purposes,  But I do not advise it, for the tone of such material is never satisfactory.

Please do not resubmit the material until it fully meets these objections. DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! JungleeDOc (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure why you are declining this article. It is similar in content to other similar articles about other medical specialty boards. This article is not promotional, and is more infact informational. It no where suggests that one one should apply for to this board. Similar content already exists for the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Interestingly, that article does not even carry references. I would appreciate it this article was reviewed by an additional editor. As far as copying from the website, there is no information that has been plagiarized from what I can see.

JungleeDOc (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)JugleeDoc

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)