User talk:Junkrak

Welcome!
Hello, Junkrak, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Peter Anton (outsider artist), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Anton (outsider artist) (August 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MJL were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Anton (outsider artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Anton (outsider artist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Peter_Anton_(outsider_artist) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MJL&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Peter_Anton_(outsider_artist) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Anton (outsider artist)


A tag has been placed on Peter Anton (outsider artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CodeLyoko buzz  00:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Audrey Doering


The article Audrey Doering has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:BLP1E, Wikipedia is not an archive of human interest stories."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed,Rosguill talk 08:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Audrey Doering for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audrey Doering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Audrey Doering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 18:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Twin Sisters Reunite for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twin Sisters Reunite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Twin Sisters Reunite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 22:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Hyperbolick. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Twin Sisters Reunite, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * also please note that placing a fake "AfD closed" template on an article talk page does not work. It also cleary shows bad faith editing.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Elsa Jean. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 02:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Elsa Jean for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elsa Jean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elsa Jean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 10:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Benny Tijerina Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benny Tijerina Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Benny Tijerina Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I've noticed that you've not yet once communicated with editors concerned with your creations. Please consider reading these warnings on your talk page. Out of 5 articles, 3 have been deleted and 2 are currently at AFD, one of which is headed to a unanimous deletion. Please stop creating content in mainspace and instead go through WP:AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I would second this; I was just about to leave a note when I edit-conflicted with Praxidicae:
 * It might be worth reading through some of our notability guidelines, and potentially WP:YFA. I also strongly suggest that you start using the Article wizard to submit drafts for review so that you can get feedback and improve the pages you write (and possibly pick better subjects to write about). If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a note, but I'd rather you not waste your time and effort writing articles that will just be deleted. Primefac (talk) 21:33, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Even I think it's a fucking waste of time. I'm just interested in some random shit, and I just put it on Wikipedia. At least I have reliable sources for this article than shit from random websites. Although, I will fix the flaws for this including the "horrible writing". Junkrak January 11, 2020 21:39 pm (UTC)
 * Chill with the incivility. And get a blog, Wikipedia isn't the place for people to write about random things they're interested in. It's an encyclopedia for encyclopedic topics. Praxidicae (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't do it just to do shit to Wikipedia's reputation. I just want to get the facts out there and present the articles. The truth is, I'm interested in it, and at the same time, I want to tell somebody. Fixed some of the flaws with the article including the shitty writing and some of the sources I've founded. Junkrak 22:14 (UTC) January 11, 2020

This is encylopedic, it counts as it, and it still is. It represents the facts, the sources right, and it tells you about the details of the murder and the trial. Junkrak 22:16 (UTC) January 11, 2020
 * I think you mistake notability for whatever it is that you're arguing about. Factual != notable. Praxidicae (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

what am i doing wrong!? I'm so fucking confused. Junkrak 22:23 (UTC) January 11, 2019
 * Have you bothered to read any of the links, myself or others have provided you? Praxidicae (talk) 22:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Oh, now I get, I'm being a huge jackass for covering a obscure topic. Carry on, chop the articles head off. Junkrak

Discretionary sanctions notice
For clarity, the immediate issue is this edit:. If you believe that editing a BLP in a manner like this is acceptable, you likely will be restricted from editing them altogether. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The user violated this topic ban earlier today with their edits before my reversion at 15:23. I had to get their edits suppressed, but suffice it to say they were once again about Onision. — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 21:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charles Manson, you may be blocked from editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Note: Your editing history is causing a number of editors to question whether or not you are WP:HERE to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. If your editing does not improve dramatically, you are probably going to end up being blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
 * The first year of the above block is under arbitration enforcement for repeated and egregious BLP violations in an area from which the editor is already topic banned, with it thereafter converting to a standard administrative sanction for not being here to build the encyclopedia. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

1993 (album) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 1993 (album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of  before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Apologies
You are not permitted to edit (or remove) a declined unblock request. If you wish to be unblocked, you must follow the instructions you've been given, in a new unblock request. I want to be very, very clear. You must follow the instructions you've been given. If you don't, you risk losing access to this talk page. So do not create a new unblock request until you've read everything posted here in January, and all of the policies you've been linked to. --Yamla (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * As you have refused to follow the instructions given you in the section, January 2020, above, I have revoked your access to this page. I have revoked it for 3 days. This will give you a chance to read everything you've been told on this page, including (but not limited to) how you can request your block be lifted. I'll warn you, if you refuse to follow the instructions once you regain access, I'll revoke your access indefinitely. Finally, note that you keep on talking about uploading images without the owners' permission. That's a serious problem, but not the reason for your block. Note that WP:UTRS is available to you, but if you abuse that, you'll be entirely out of options. --Yamla (talk) 21:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * This is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

I have revoked your access to this talk page. You either lack sufficient competence to follow the instructions you've been given or you are deliberately trolling us. Either way, enough. --Yamla (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.