User talk:Junoongrill

A lengthy welcome
Hi Junoongrill. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

"Added citation"
Please do not use the edit summary "added citation" when all you have done is add an internal link (wikilink). A wikilink is something very different from a citation. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 05:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hi Junoongrill! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 19:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of sex symbols, you may be blocked from editing. Editing against consensus, poor sourcing possibly in BLP matters Drmies (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * You have made a substantial amount of edits to List of sex symbols so much so that the list is a mess of indiscriminate BLP violations. All edits regarding blps must be reliably sourced and in cases like lists or categories they must be WP:DEFINING. A one off "this person is sexy!" in a listicle is neither of those things and most of the additions you've made are very poorly or outright incorrectly sourced, including your latest edit where the subject refutes such titles. Please be aware of WP:BLP and take extra caution with your sourcing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing List of sex symbols for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Please use the article talk page to request changes and ensure that you review the many messages and links provided to you here in order to educate yourself regarding reliable sources. If the poor sourcing continues when the block expires, I imagine you will find yourself blocked from the article indefinitely.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)