User talk:Juparo44

Welcome!
Hello, Juparo44, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Brenda Sue Fulton does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 08:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your constructive criticism, I will look over the entry and assure that it follows the rules. It is, however, important that the factual information not be buried, but presented as they were written.

Brenda Sue Fulton
Per WP:NPOV, and specifically WP:UNDUE, it is inappropriate to give undue weight to Fulton's Senate confirmation hearing. We can make mention of it, with links to appropriate sources, but attempts to pad out the section as you have done give rise to a question of neutrality: specifically it appear to be an attempt to besmirch her reputation in the eyes of conservative readers. By giving the item its due weight and linking to the sources, we can allow readers to reach their own conclusions regarding her statements. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your input; I like the streamlined version that you posted. I added the responsibilities of Fulton's potential position, which is necessary to understand why her comments were under scrutiny.