User talk:Jupitus Smart/Archive 1

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Kilian Kleinschmidt. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * sorry about that. If you look at the edits I had previously added the image as you have specified. But I felt that the image looked too huge, and tried out many things to reduce its size. I must have left it after the last edit, without reverting back to the original state. Anyway it would be nice if you could reduce the size of the image. It looks a little too huge for the page.  Jupitus Smart  16:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries!! It is all part of learning. That's why I left the message. There is another param called that gives you control over the size of the image. See the most recent change... Keep up the good work! -- Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Jupitus Smart, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Rob 13 Talk 00:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Ash-Shaliheen Mosque page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=764843391 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F764843391%7CAsh-Shaliheen Mosque%5D%5D Ask for help])

DYK for East Base
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Renault Trezor
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Renault Trezor
Correct, I didn't promote this one. But my two cents are that I agree with not using it in the lead slot with the picture because while it looks fine in regular size in the article, in the small space allowed for DYK pics it's hard to see what it is and see its details. Everyone, including me, is disappointed when their DYK hook doesn't get the lead slot. As for me, I choose pics that are easy to tell what it is in DYK size, interesting, and use DYKs from a variety of editors. HalfGig  talk  12:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks  Jupitus Smart  04:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Nakatsu Castle
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Just encountered Nakatsu Castle as a result of this DYK? - wanted to drop by and say thank you for such a nice little article; I never knew about this castle before now. Sterling work! Yunshui 雲 水 11:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I am however done with my Japanese article in my quest to make an article from each of the nations of the world. Anyway its good to know that I managed to impress a Japanese person with my article. I came back from semi-retirement to reply to your pleasantries and I will now be returning to my self-imposed exile.  Jupitus Smart  11:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I wish you luck with your (admirable) quest, and if that's the sort of article you can churn out, hope that your exile is a brief one. All the best, Yunshui 雲 水 11:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * :)  Jupitus Smart  11:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jane Maria Strachey
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history
You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Indian defence services
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Jupitus Smart. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AJupitus_Smart enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 23:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Vizag
Why u changed the content? Sai krishna 98 (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought it was obvious, but I believe I should have made myself more clear. Facebook posts are not allowed as references, and if you have a reliable source quoting your numbers, that website must be directly linked to. I thought you would have realised that with all your block warnings earlier.  Jupitus Smart  03:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * But it is the Facebook page of Government of Andhra Pradesh.How can u ignore that? Sai krishna 98 (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't make new sections each time you want to comment. As for your question, you didn't even give the link to the post mentioning your claim. How do you expect me to verify your claim, if you just give me the link to a Facebook Page. Atleast comment the link to the Facebook post saying that Vizag is the 8th largest city by GDP, here and I will see what can be done.  Jupitus Smart  03:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Mr Jupiter I understand your concern. Click the link. It will direct to the page. Then scroll down the page. Scroll down. See the post on 19th feb at 12 :15. In that post ,more option will be there click it. Then u can see information about Visakhapatnam Sai krishna 98 (talk) 03:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Tell me ur gmail I will send the photos if u don't understand Sai krishna 98 (talk) 03:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you understand English, . Just paste the link to the facebook post mentioning the same as a comment below this. That will probably not be enough, but its good for a start. I searched for the 8th largest city claim, and though it appears in some pages, none of them are Reliable Sources. At best you can add the Computer Society of India link as reference - and I will not revert it.  Jupitus Smart  04:00, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you trying to do some kind of circular referencing. The Vishakapatnam city page mentions Economy of Visakhapatnam as the source for the 8th largest city claim in this Facebook post - . Your intentions therefore seem very fishy. Are you a government official?.  Jupitus Smart  04:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I used the computer society of India reference don't revert Sai krishna 98 (talk) 04:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

As I said before, the Computer Society of India reference is not perfect, but okay. So while I won't revert it, if somebody else does, I won't be able to help you. And if you are being paid by the government to add the data, an administrator will surely revert the edit and block you soon. Consider reading WP:PAID. Cheers.  Jupitus Smart  04:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sai krishna 98 (talk) 04:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * A thanks is not enough, . You need to read WP:PAID and make a disclosure that you are on the payrolls of the government, if you are getting paid for editing the page. If you do so, maybe your edit will not be reverted, provided the reference is considered as okay by other editors.  Jupitus Smart  04:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not paid by the Government to do these silly things.I have an intention to remove false things in Wikipedia.since Government is saying that Visakhapatnam is 8th largest economy,so why should those false things are still to be considered.That is my intention. Sai krishna 98 (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * While it does not seem so, as you only edit pages of Visakhapatnam and Economy of Visakhapatnam, I cannot make any unilateral decisions on this. Let us see what experienced editors like and  have to say about this, as they have repeatedly warned you on your talk page.  Jupitus Smart  04:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Fine for removal of Facebook link. The new link is just showing blank page.-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   05:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I hope you are talking about this link, which is the new reference - . Its not a blank page and mentions the data that  is trying to add, though whether the website can be considered as a reliable source is something I am not sure of.  Jupitus Smart  05:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm just getting a website and its showing About CSI information, but when I clicked About Vizag just a blank page with large font About Us.-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   05:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know how that can be. When I click on the link, I see a page that says About Us with About Visakhapatnam as the sub-heading. I am viewing the desktop version and that can be the only probable reason I can think of for the anomaly.  Jupitus Smart  06:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, right I'm using tab, so that may be the problem. If you can view the required info, it's fine. Cheers!

I just saw that in a mobile version, it's a copy of wiki, non reliable. Can check vizag page intro.-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   06:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You seem to be correct, . What do you suggest be done now. The facebook reference which we reverted is tagged for want of a better source in the Visakhapatnam page. Should we do the same in the Economy of Visakhapatnam page or should the edit be reverted. Jupitus Smart  06:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've corrected the info on vizag page, changed by the user here.-- Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   06:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * And I undid the one on the Economy of Visakhapatnam page. Hope that solves the issue for now. Jupitus Smart  06:29, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Why is the Facebook reference not sufficient and you are telling it as unreliable even it is the page of Government of Andhra Pradesh Sai krishna 98 (talk) 07:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Facebook posts are not considered reliable irrespective of whose page it is. If you can provide a proper Government website which says the same thing, it can be added. If you revert any of the edits again you will be blocked for being against the Wikipedia policies on Edit warring. So I urge you to find a proper source before editing the page again.  Jupitus Smart  07:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This editor has been trying to push this one point, using less and less reliable sources, since his first edit on 12 March - see my talk page for 2 more strings of attempts to explain about WP:RS - A clear case of WP:IDHT - Arjayay (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * By the looks of it he has been away since his last warning. Hopefully it will continue.  Jupitus Smart  03:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

"Black money issue"
Hi Jupitus, I restored the vague template you removed in this edit. Though the link is appreciated, the statement is still vague, as readers do not presently know what the story is or how it relates to "the black money issue", whatever that is. Even the source is vague. Do we mean that one of the characters is a gangster? Is someone fighting against black money? No idea. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The date is mentioned in the 4th reference, so probably that has a citation. I haven't seen the movie, and don't know anything beyond the fact that the movie touches upon "the black money issue", as was mentioned in the 1st and 2nd references. Going by the reviews one of the characters is a gangster but its not clearly mentioned whether he is fighting against or to save his own black money. So I cannot do much about it, apart from waiting for somebody else to clarify that. Cheers.  Jupitus Smart  04:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Inappropriate Removal of true items worthy of addition to page
I am Christopher R. Fuentes-Padilla the Official Candidate for New York State Assembly in 2018's election versus the incumbent Nily Rozic. The filing occurred four weeks ago. And appropriate approval was received. I suggest that information is checked accurately before removing valid information about a year's old candidate, Usman Ali Chohan and the next year's opposition.

Cfuentespadilla1421 (talk) 06:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * A lot of people contest against notable politicians. What makes you notable enough to be included in Nily Rozic's Wikipedia page. Do you have any newspapers or other reliable sources writing about your contest with the said candidate apart from your own facebook post and the Libertarian Party website. Anyway Wikipedia is not a place where you can express your personal views against any candidate, as you have done so with sentences like "He claims that "if Nily Rozic was truly in support of Women in New York State, she would have ran on the Women's Equality Line in 2016. "And she would resign from the Puerto Rican Hispanic Task Force Being she has no involvement in our history or culture.", which you source from your facebook post. Anyway if you are indeed the person who you claim to be, I would advise against edit warring on the Nily Rozic page, as you risk getting blocked. Cheers.  Jupitus Smart  06:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

The information you deleted is fine as that was added by one of my staff members. The 2016 information should have stayed as it was long overdue to be added to her page to show the results of her last election. Cfuentespadilla1421 (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * First decide if the information I deleted was correct or wrong. You have served me an improper deletion notice while you now say that it was fine. Yet you continue to add the unsourced material. I don't want to edit war with you, so I'll wait and watch what administrators decide before reverting your edits again.  Jupitus Smart  06:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Inappropriate Deletions from Nily Rozic
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia. Your deleting validated information about her 2016 election that was cited and referenced on NYS Board of Elections Sites and her own Ballotpedia site.

Cfuentespadilla1421 (talk) 06:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I only removed information about what the loosing candidate did after the elections, which is not mentioned in any of the links that you have provided.  Jupitus Smart  06:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Understood, this is a misunderstanding on my part. I saw the deletion of my information as ok since as your previously stated, the citations were not attached. But, the information was deleted on my side and I was too easy to assume it was you, partially since you were deleting all of the edits. I do apologize for the inconvenience made to you if any.Cfuentespadilla1421 (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Good. Anyway Nily Rozic has been semi-protected according to my request and your edits on Rory Lancman has been reverted as well. You seem to have stopped edit warring and adding unsourced material as well, so there remains nothing else to be done. Cheers  Jupitus Smart  08:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Mz7 (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Hi - regarding my article on Prof Dr Suresh David
Hi Jupitus Smart, It's nice to hear you noticed my draft. Naepin is a friend & a colleague. I do not understand why you need to ask about that! Anyways there are people here who have helped me without any questions, I had been associated with CMC, many years ago, for a very short while though. Seen and heard about the ED and EM developing under Dr Suresh David and he has contributed a lot to the field. If you read through development of EM in India you will notice, he had started it etc etc. It's all over. I really did not know wikipedia pages were created by people. I am an editor in few journals in my field. I wanted to create pages, edit etc. I didnt know what to create - I searched for my birthplace, schools i studied in, Colleges i did my studies, everything was there. Then I thought of creating something on a notable person. Tat's how i started this. Right decision or not i do not know. But only after i started i realised this was so much different etc. Many of them have been kind enough to help me though, I am glad. I really want to know how i can help with other pages and people too. I do not know if you will help me, but since you asked, I hope your questions are answered and I also hope I have not offended you. Thanks & Regards Yourgirl (talk) 20:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * When two new editors collaborate exclusively on a single article, it is cause enough for other editors to get suspicious. Anyway I wish you and Naepin all the best in getting Dr. Suresh David's article published and hope you continue editing other articles in Wikipedia. Your answers were not the most convincing (also because your story does not explain how you got the photograph) but I'll still give you some suggestions on improving the article :

 Jupitus Smart  03:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The article is too long at 1407 words, for a not so notable person. I suggest removing the CV style data which mentions each and every achievement of Dr. Suresh David. Ideally (not necessarily) cut the article down to around 500 words. The article seems to have been copied from his resume though I cannot find the link. Anyway look at similar doctors in Category:20th-century Indian medical doctors and see how their articles were written.
 * Remove all the self published sources including LinkedIn and Slideshare references. Read WP:RS to know what references are considered as reliable sources. Also remove the circular references, like mentioning that he wrote some textbook and using the same textbook as the reference for that fact.
 * The initial paragraph is too long. Again look at how the other doctor Wikipedia pages have been written.

Yourgirl (talk) 11:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much, really appreciate it. Shall try again. Will let you know how it goes along. Thank you once again. Good luck to you too.

Yourgirl (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Thanks for the suggestions,Many people helped in creating the article, Good luck.

Merger discussion for @home
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;@home&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. HighFlyingFish (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Lol
LOL and probably true. I thought as much myself, but I like to give people an opportunity to tell me a convoluted tale. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Mammootty has been going through a lean patch over the last few years. None of his movies are minting any money, and even the much hyped Great Father failed miserably. Mohanlal who was also nearing his end days received an unexpected windfall over the last few months, meaning 4 of his recent movies are in the top 10. This is what irks Mammooty fans, and that is why they swarm to vandalise articles of Mohanlal's new movies, most of which are protected now. The Great Father which was one of Mammooty fans biggest hopes of a turnaround is therefore now being presented as a hit, so as to somehow bring Mammootty's career back on track.  Jupitus Smart  06:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Interesting take, thanks for the write-up. I'm a bit familiar with how irritable Mohanlal and Mammootty fans can get, but the details are good. There was an epic edit-war a few years back (here's one of the guys) where two users kept battling across articles trying to reposition their favorite actor to the front of the starring parameter and cast list. It was soooo absurd. And then long after it quelled, someone changed the name of a template from something like "Films starring Mohanlal and Mammootty" to "Films starring Mammootty and Mohanlal". Just makes you want to punch yourself in the face. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

and you really mean to say that
"potential links between supporters of President Trump and the Russian government" in Firing of FBI Director James Comey has nothing to do with Donald Trump–Russia dossier? Reverting the link and sending me thanks? Most fascinating and confusing. -- Kku (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that . I was reverting the other person's edits, but accidentally ended up reverting yours. Before I could change it back somebody else had done the needful. The thanks was intended as an apology.  Jupitus Smart  10:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. I understand that the assembly line for this article is currently a little overcrowded with labor force. -- Kku (talk) 10:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja
Hi there, re: this, you should be aware that there was a good deal of debate about the gross of Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja at Talk:Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film). I don't have a specific position on it, but I think the dispute was a reason why the gross wasn't included in the film article. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I may have jumped the gun on that. I did not check the talk page, and went with what the link said. Thanks for pointing that out.  Jupitus Smart  17:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know whether or not your change was wrong, I just thought I'd point out that there was some dispute about it in the past. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Its good that you did. I'd rather let these things be decided by consensus. And I personally think that the 49 crore figure is exaggerated as well. That movie was mediocre at its best.  Jupitus Smart  17:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Note
Ilikerabbits! is 123.231.107.255, I think. If so, has possibly reached enough unsourced POV-pushing warnings for AIV. I was considering reporting but activity seemed to cease at that point. But maybe it's not over, afterall... — Paleo  Neonate  — 12:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Err, I meant ANI, not AIV, sorry. —  Paleo  Neonate  — 12:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What are you trying to say . The user has not edited since 10th May, so what use is taking him to AIV/ANI.  Jupitus Smart  12:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh I just meant that 123.231.107.255 stopped just at the right moment on the 10th before getting reported, but is likely to now be back as Ilikerabbits!. I only shared the information because you also recently reverted a relevant edit.  Sorry for the confusion, —  Paleo  Neonate  — 12:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, I know the frustration when IPs turn stale after reporting. I will take a look at Ilikerabbits! and see what I can do.  Jupitus Smart  12:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * He seems to have gone quiet since the last 30 minutes. I will check on him later, to see if he is still adding POV edits.  Jupitus Smart  12:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I will also check from time to time.  Cheers, —  Paleo  Neonate  — 13:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Catch?
Hey there, re: this, what happened to the Catch estimate? Though it hasn't been discussed extensively, Catch was established by a notable journalist. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * But there was a higher number mentioned, and it could have been collected after Catch's estimate. I am not refuting Catch's estimate, but movie grosses are not static, and the movie could have grossed the extra amount after Catch released their numbers.  Jupitus Smart  04:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * There's always going to be a higher number in a range (for obvious reasons) and higher numbers don't always equate to higher accuracy, but more importantly, you're probably right in this instance, since the film was still in theatres and the Catch source says "The film is still running to packed houses in limited screens across the Kerala and has so far grossed Rs. 63 crore worldwide." So yes, I agree that the film presumably made money subsequent to that report. My apologies for the hassle, and I appreciate your reply. It helped me logic through this. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Manorama's gross was more like an annual report mentioning performances of Mohanlal's movies. It was therefore expected to be more closer to the actual final figures, and that was another reason why I chose that.  Jupitus Smart  04:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Sources Used In Highest Grossing Indian Films
Sir in the section of Malayalam movies the source used for Pulimurugan is Catch News. According to your view how is it is a reliable course. Also in the Movie Drishyam the source is used is DNA. Is these two sources are reliable?? Os inuth.com is reliable source??? Muhammed.suhail (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * inuth.com is not considered a reliable source. Catch News and DNA are considered as reliable, based on my understanding of the existing consensus.  Jupitus Smart  18:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Pulimurugan and Drishyam has many other sources supporting their claim. All the sources agree on the 150+ and 75 crore claims of both the movies. A simple search can confirm that.  Jupitus Smart  18:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hello Jupitus Smart. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. S warm  ♠  03:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Trashigang Dzong
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Scherezade Shroff Talwar
Dear User:Jupitus Smart, I recently wrote an article on Wikipedia entitled Scherezade Shroff Talwar, but it seems to be lacking in more compelling details about this young lady's talents. If you have anything to add, please feel free to do so. I have turned to you since I have noticed that most of your articles concern India. All the best to you.Davidbena (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I edited the article a little bit, but in the process I realised that maybe you have a vested interest in the article. Many of the the things mentioned in the article are not mentioned in the inline citations that you have provided. I also checked your history, and find it suspicious that a person editing Jewish religious material all this while would one day jump into creating an unknown Indian Vlogger. If you can provide me the reasons for the same, I will help you out. And if not, I will remove all the fluff myself. Thanks.  Jupitus Smart  03:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually I have no vested interest in the article. I do not even know the individual personally, but have only seen her on YouTube videos. I live in Israel, and she lives with her husband in Mumbai. This, however, was my first article written about a living person. In fact, I watch many YouTube vlogs, and I felt that she was deserving of recognition because of her talents.Davidbena (talk) 04:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That still does not explain why you would add something not present in the inline citations to the article. The school and college she attended, her assignment with New Port, all of these are not mentioned in any of the references. Where did you get that from?  Jupitus Smart  04:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything that I added about the vlogger, with a cited reference, is indeed there to be seen in the reference. Where I declined to bring down a reference, I thought it was unimportant. Nevertheless, when I collected the information to write about her, the information about her schooling she explained in one of her videos. Other information was gleaned from other videos. If you'd like, I can send to you the link.Davidbena (talk) 04:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You can see her school history here.Davidbena (talk) 04:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You are probably experienced enough to know that we don't work that way. Anyway I will remove the unimportant things and try and edit the article based on the references provided. Even though I would like to assume WP:AGF all the time, I had a bad experience helping out in improving Namrata Purohit, whose creator turned out to be a sockpuppet and a paid editor. So I am cautious about such activities, though I will help you since your answers seem genuine. Cheers.  Jupitus Smart  04:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I can assure you that I am not being paid for my editing, neither am I a sock-puppet. I have turned unto you in complete honesty, because of the template that someone had placed above the article. I just don't have the time, nor the means to further research this woman's life experiences. Be well, and thanks.Davidbena (talk) 04:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Thank you . 4300 good edits and you are the first human to share some WikiLove. Much appreciated.  Jupitus Smart  11:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Vinod Rai, Former CAG from Parsa
Thanks for reviewing the article Parsa, Ghazipur. However I would like to submit few references regarding Parsa as native place of Vinod Rai and A.N. Rai. just go through these links.
 * http://www.amarujala.com/uttar-pradesh/varanasi/cag-vinod-rai-aapointed-bcci-head-by-supreme-court
 * http://www.jagran.com/news/national-parsa-completed-his-humor-on-binod-9626703.html?src=Search-ART-parsa%20completed%20his%20humor%20on%20binod
 * http://www.realityviews.in/2013/05/short-biography-of-cag-auditor-vinod.html
 * http://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/ghazipur-13657975.html
 * http://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/hindi/uttar+pradesh-epaper-uttar/purvanchal+ka+badha+sammanah+gajipur+ke+lal+ko+bisisiaai+me+mili+badi+jimmedari-newsid-63245149

For A.N. Rai you can see.
 * http://www.dnaindia.com/academy/report-naac-gets-its-first-north-indian-director-1847908

If all these are reliable enough, please restore it or allow me to re-edit the article Parsa, Ghazipur. Regards--Yavarai (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Yavarai
 * Added. Useful tip : By and large if the news site has a Wikipage, it would generally be considered a reliable source.  Jupitus Smart  15:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you .  Jupitus Smart  15:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Gauthier Destenay
Hello! Your submission of Gauthier Destenay at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Mt. Hood Independent Film Festival
Hello, Jupitus. I've reverted your re-listing of the AfD nomination of the above-named article. Nominations that have not received comments can be treated by administrators as uncontested proposed deletions. Your re-listing would have removed that option for the administrators, hence my reversion. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * While I personally don't mind your reverting, I don't think administrators usually delete them like PRODs after the first week, especially when its such a large article with proper references. So the AfD is probably going to anyway end up getting relisted. But if you would rather wait to see if an administrator is brave enough, I don't mind. Cheers.  Jupitus Smart  17:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Posters
Namaste dear Jupitus Smart! Can you find poster to movie in your Malayalam ATM (2015 film) and find songs and who sings and need find poster to Tamil movie Mayavan? Thank you! --178.71.200.95 (talk) 20:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If i understood correctly you need me to find posters for these movies. Here are some links - ATM1 and ATM2, Mayavan1 and Mayavan2. Both seems okay, though I am no authority on posters, as I just learnt how to upload them without any issues. You would be better off if you looked at what is written below an already uploaded poster and write accordingly when uploading yourself.  Jupitus Smart  03:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello jupitus,i am ayush 259 and its think that you are the greatest fool on earth.
 * You are free to think whatever you want. However abusing can lead to you being blocked, so you are better off nt doing that.  Jupitus Smart  10:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for List of Kolpak cricketers
Vanamonde (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello Jupitus Smart. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Aayush sinkhwal. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You should probably think twice before templating users who are much more experienced than you. The consensus is towards hasty A1 and A3 nominations. It does not say anything about A7 nomination, which is what I nominated the article for, which I did after independently searching for the subject. The article has been deleted by an administrator who chose to ignore your message as well. An apology is probably due.  Jupitus Smart  13:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not realize that  does not apply to speedy deletions under WP:A7. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you .  Jupitus Smart  13:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your kind attention please
please have a look on my newly created article Shrivardhan Trivedi and let me know whether I have made any mistake. Regards--Yavarai (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Yavarai
 * 2 respected editors have PRODed it with valid concerns. You have added a pretty candid photograph suggesting possible WP:COI. There is not much I can do, other than watch as it gets deleted. At best you can remove the PROD tag after which it will be taken to AfD, probably by one of the nominators, where based on my experience I can assure that it will most probably be deleted. So, its basically useless to try.  Jupitus Smart  19:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, Thanks--Yavarai (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Yavarai

Thanks for noticing !
Thanks for noticing the new article I wrote, Think Big and Kick Ass ! What do you think of the article? Sagecandor (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Good work with the article. Consider taking it to DYK. A cursory look makes me feel that it meets all the criteria.  Jupitus Smart  18:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd rather not nominate it to DYK myself, but if you want to nominate, feel free? Sagecandor (talk) 18:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty lazy at that as well. You still have 7 days left, so think about it. Cheers.  Jupitus Smart  18:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've created a ton of new articles lately. I don't want to flood the place. :( Sagecandor (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Well its sad then that this won't be nominated. Maybe its time will come some other time (If it reaches GA/FA someday).  Jupitus Smart  18:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lamborghini Asterion at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Gauthier Destenay
Vanamonde (talk) 05:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of St. Cajetan Church
Hello! Your submission of St. Cajetan Church at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Everymorning (talk) 13:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Age of person
You have taken the age of Toni Phillips down. Please refrain from undoing true information. She is a friend if mine. The birthday is 23rd July 1981 if you would like photographic evidence. Many thanks Lukeyboy24 (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You have messed up the article, as you can see for yourself. I am a little busy now and probably one of the other editors will revert your edits anyway, so best.  Jupitus Smart  13:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Bhallaladeva
Kindly understand, the page is enough long and the character deserves a separate page. So please don't try to delete it and if you want to help, then make separate pages of other Baahubali franchise characters too, because its not just a film series, but is a franchise that contains all of movies, animated series, live action series and even novel. It is equally imporatant as of other franchises characters lIke marvel and DC characters. SO, don't blinly revert this page. I am aman goyal (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have replied on the talk page of the article. Best.  Jupitus Smart  14:09, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

ANI posting...
It helps if you let others know what page you are talking about. Wikipedians are notoriously bad at mind reading. Have a nice day. Kleuske (talk) 09:12, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out . One of the problems of not reading what you have written.  Jupitus Smart  09:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

List of highest grossing Indian films
Hi, like you reverted the disputed list of adjusted gross on the page, please revert the page ' List of highest grossing Indian films' back to this version till a consensus is achieved. The current 'Highest-grossing films by year' section on the page is using the same misleading numbers and disputed source, as the other section you removed. SoniaKovind (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I cannot revert that until a discussion on the same has been done. You should ideally begin discussing with the other user on the talk page as with the inflation adjusted numbers. If a consensus is not arrived, we may think about reverting. Personally I think these edits are not as misleading as the inflated adjusted numbers. While I accept that its not the best method to arrive at the numbers, the ideal solution will be to convince the other editor about the same. Regards.  Jupitus Smart  12:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * We are actually discussing it already, the same discussion you joined earlier today. My point was that you only reverted a part of the disputed edits, the section I have mentioned is also the subject of the discussion as it uses the same misleading content and disputed, unreliable sources as the section you deleted earlier. Just as you mentioned that leaving misleading data on a high traffic page is not desirable. I request you to please remove it till the discussion is on. Thanks SoniaKovind (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussing here won't achieve any purpose. Let us discuss this in the talk page of the article, where all concerned parties can be involved.  Jupitus Smart  12:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

It's authentic
Hi the page is authentic and must not be deleted==Speedy deletion nomination of Mohit Baghel==

A tag has been placed on Mohit Baghel, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nabeel Gm 12:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC) Nabeel Gm 12:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't know what this is supposed to mean . I know that such a person exists but that does not mean he is notable enough to merit an article. And if you want to save the article, try adding better sources to the article, instead of commenting here.  Jupitus Smart  12:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank You So much Sir
Thank you for the review of my Draft sir. I Will surely try to improve it.cosnis 19:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay.  Jupitus Smart  04:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Sunil Babu Pant
IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Velipadinte Pusthakam
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 22:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Mungarumale collected ₹75 crore
Hello, I'm Tevar shaa. I wanted to let you know that According to reports at that time, #Mungarumale was the first film to touch ₹50 crore and even within 300 days [http://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/south-masala/mungaru-male-actor-ganesh-shashank/articleshow/46691963.cms? See this].. And ran for 1 year continuously in PVR with packed houses. And went on to run over 865 days and raked over ₹75 crore in its life time in #Karnataka. and.

Actually the Mungarumale collection is not announced by any primary sources like producer/actor/director/distributors, it is by critic, named C.H. Prahlada Rao, who told to "DNA"
 * Templating me won't help your cause nor will discussing it in my talk page. I am not the authority to decide on such things but will however re-iterate what I have mentioned before in the talk page of List of Highest Grossing Indian movies.
 * Indiaglitz is considered a non-reliable source according to WP:ICTFFAQ
 * New Indian Express does not say anything about 75 crores
 * The DNA source has been discussed extensively on the talk page of List of Highest Grossing Indian movies.
 * Most, if not all the sources agree on the 50 crore figure. The 75 crore figure can therefore be considered as an error on the part or the person who claimed it. And this source clearly says that Raajkumara had already become the highest grossing Kannada movie when its 100 day celebrations were held with the gross at 70 crores. That effectively rules out any possibility of Mungaru Male's 75 crore figure being accepted as true by anybody in the industry.  Jupitus Smart  12:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for The Beast (book)
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Jupitus Smart. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Alex ShihTalk 11:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Sergio Rubino
Dear Jupitus Smart,
 * thank you for writing:
 * "Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sergio Rubino, from its old location at User:Sergio Rubino/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 20:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)"
 * Hope you read the article. My question is: Is it possible to publish the article like it is now? Or do we have to add more information? If yes, which? This page already exists in German and Italian language.
 * Thank you so much in advance for your help.
 * With best regards,
 * Silke Weigand (Sergio Rubinos partner)--Sergio Rubino (talk) 10:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not very keen about people associated with article subjects writing the articles. Since you are his partner,, I suggest you read WP:COI. As for the article, it has a lot of problems, which will probably mean the article will not pass. For one, most of the things mentioned in the article don't have references. If the article exists in German/Italian Wikipedias, you may use the references used there and any other reference from reliable sources, as we don't require references to be in English. Also the article reads like a resume. You should ideally cut down on the excessive details like, the list of all his exhibitions and publications etc. Here are some decently written articles for you to model yours on - Don Reitz or Aristide Maillol or even Amedeo Modigliani. If you look at them, none of them lists art exhibitions or publications or other such non-substantial data. Best of luck. Jupitus Smart  10:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Lamborghini Asterion
IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

 * Thank You Rangreza.  Jupitus Smart  08:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for St. Cajetan Church
Alex ShihTalk 00:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Request on 18:23:43, 17 July 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Echoasis
Hello Jupitus Smart,

You recently declined an article, 'Soothe', I edited. The reason provided was that this draft looked like an advertisement. However, I believe the content was truthful and objective given that Soothe is a company which provides personal services, so the draft was purely stating the service itself instead of promoting anything. And the references were also from varied valid sources instead of first-hand press release or promotional articles. I would really appreciate it if you could provide more inputs regarding how I could improve this draft and to be accepted. I really hope this article could be published so my efforts were not for nothing.

Thank you very much. Sincerely, Echoasis

Echoasis (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You are free to believe differently, . However when 3 editors - me, and admin  who deleted the earlier draft feel that it is an advertorial article per Wikipedia's standards, than probably it is. As for improving this article, I think that this is a huge mess that can hardly be improved. It would be better for you to blank the page, and start over, modelling the article on similar companies, who already have Wiki pages. Some of the things that you will not usually find on Wiki pages include - locations served or some of the information you have included in sections like Service or Soothe at Work. These information are better off in the company website and not in an encyclopedia, and therefore are essentially considered as advertorial content by us. Hope you have understood the gist of our policies. Best.  Jupitus Smart  03:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

14:08:21, 18 July 2017 review of submission by Photographer Sunil K. Dutt
Photographer Sunil K. Dutt (talk) 14:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC) I request you to let me know that why you have rejected my article, and how can I improve it and then it can be accepted. Thank you. Photographer Sunil K. Dutt (talk) 14:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This has been addressed in detail in the decline reason, as well as the extensive comment that I have left below the tags. Please refer there and let me know if you still haven't understood.  Jupitus Smart  18:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)