User talk:Juradon

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please don't use Wikipedia to evangelize. See WP:NPOV and WP:NOT. NawlinWiki 18:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I need help to get an article posted, Types of Christ, it keeps coming back as insuffecient context. Any help would be really appreciated. I don't really want to lose what I wrote. Thanks, Juradon donbmills@hotmail.com
 * Please do not attempt to post the TYPE article a third time. The problem is not lack of content, it is the type of content. It is unencyclopedic. The main objection is that it is original research. Nor does Wikipedia accept propaganda whether it be political or religious. -- RHaworth 08:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

These concepts have been well known throughout the Christian community and most Christians could give you a limited answer proving that these concepts are not new to the Christian community. Clarence Larkin wrote on this subject a 100 years ago in his book called, Dispensational Truth. The book is still printed by a (number) of printers but as far as the publisher at this time I couldn't tell you.

It is printed by permission of author:

Lifline Philippines P.O. Box 335 Adrian, MI. 49221 (517) 265 6408

I hope this helps. I am not trying to bring any new teaching but actually bring up the types found in the Bible that help believers understand the Bible better. Types in the Bible are only a shadow of things of things to come. Kind regards...

Juradon
 * A short article entitled Types of Christ might survive. But it must be written as a proper Wikipedia article with a neutral tone and with proper references. A sermon / essay such as you have submitted will not be acceptable. -- RHaworth 19:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I will try again and will let you look at it first on this page if that is ok? I will go back through and add a disclaimer to say that these are only types recognized by many people but are not the very teaching itself. I will see if I can restructure some of the language to more informational only. Most of what I wrote was scripture addressing a theme that two people had in common in the Bible. I would really appreciate any pointers on this if there is a particular statement that should be changed. I am new at this and I don't want problems and I'm not trying to rewrite the Bible, but bring out things that are recognized already by millions of Christians. Thank you for your help

Juradon