User talk:Jus.Hong/sandbox

Your article so far has a lot of really interesting information, and I can definitely see why creating this article is important. I also like this history section that you put in, it really helps to give readers a clear timeline of your topic. One thing I might suggest adding is a clear definition of mechanical doping at the very beginning of your article, just so people have a clear idea of what it is before they start reading about it. I think that the biggest thing to work on is just organizing your facts into clear paragraphs and writing them out. Kaitling (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

What does the article (or section) do well? - gives good background to give the reader a solid understanding of the history of the topic. - i liked the section on the 2020 world athletic statements on shoe technology because it explained a little more on how shoe technology could give runners an advantage. It was helpful because as someone who doesn't know much about mechanical doping in athletics, it gave me a deeper understanding of the topic

What changes would you suggest overall? - maybe explain exactly what mechanical doping is in the beginning. I understood your article because you explained in the beginning before I read your article, but it could be helpful to include that in the lede! - add more transitions (but I think you're already on your way!) - maybe add more scientific research on how these technological modifications actually help reduce running time? More stats

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? - adding scientific research (but I'm sure you have this in mind and just haven't gotten to it yet) Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? - table of contents! I like the subsections and how it gives a nice overview of the article. I will be adding those to mine!Chae00 (talk) 15:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)