User talk:JustBerry/Archive 4

Please comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

✅

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/June 2014 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/June 2014. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/June 2014 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Torchiest talkedits 02:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries, I have put a WP:SPEEDY on the page. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks for letting me know. --JustBerry (talk) 02:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, I tried speedying it as a redirect that wouldn't be used, but that was denied. The problem is that has a history, even though the text was the same as the other one. It's just a bit of extra procedure. But maybe you as page creator will have your tag accepted.  Cheers. —Torchiest talkedits 02:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, that might have been the case. Anyways, like you said, as the page creator, my speedy was accepted; it's taken care of now. --JustBerry (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

✅

Please comment on Talk:Violet (color)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Violet (color). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alcohol flush reaction
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alcohol flush reaction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Sant Llorenç d'Hortons
You removed some links to Sant Llorenç d'Hortons because that article isn't referenced. There are, however, references and external links in the corresponding article in the Spanish Wikipedia, es:San Lorenzo de Hortóns, that make me reasonably confident that this is a real place. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold fusion
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cold fusion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sunburn
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sunburn. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Please Help Monitor Talk:Blog
Hello JustBerry! I was hoping you may be willing to help me weed out the massive spam being added to the discussion page, Talk:Blog. As an avid blogger myself, I am bothered by this vandalism and it bothers me even more that no one is taking the time to monitor this page. I have removed large chunks of spam today, but from some of the previous posters, this has been an ongoing problem. Thanks. Ormr2014 (talk) 22:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Race Differences in Intelligence (book)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Race Differences in Intelligence (book). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Duloxetine
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Duloxetine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kozyrev mirror
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kozyrev mirror. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gliese 581
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gliese 581. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

23:06:39, 8 July 2014 review of submission by 3250oceanpark
Although the article clearly explains that Ben was the elected president of the SMMUSD school board, a "significant/important" position, the user who declined the request gave the following reason: "stop submitting if you are not able to explain the significance/importance of this person"

The majority of the article describes Ben's school board presidency, a significant/notable position. Wikipedia's guidelines on notability clearly define notability: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." The article cites numerous independent sources discussing Ben. By Wikipedia's definition, Ben is "notable."

3250oceanpark (talk) 23:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * "President of a school board" is not a notable political position. Most of your "references" are not valid third party sources.  As a mere candidate for Senate, he does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.  By Wikipedia's guidelines, they're not notable  the panda ₯’  23:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

(User talk: DangerousPanda)
 * Why aren't the sources valid? They were not created by Ben, and are third party sources. Would the article follow wikipedia's guidelines if it was not under WP:POLITICIAN? 3250oceanpark (talk) 03:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Cite doi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Cite doi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation Museum
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Myofascial meridians
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Myofascial meridians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mensuration
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mensuration. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

✅ ...Read.

21:41:47, 12 December 2014 review of submission by Williamsanten
Williamsanten (talk) 21:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

DRN needs assistance
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Rocksalt1111 Message
Really struggling with how to use talk pages and get an understanding of what to do with talk pages, so if I have done this wrong, sorry. Signed Rocksalt1111. On the TrueERP article I have uploaded a new image and signed it, but it is way to big. Where do I go to adjust the image size.

16:56:26, 24 November 2014 review of submission by Peter Jenney
Hi, it's not so much a re-review yet as a reason why the submission was deemed not notable according to verifiable references, when one of those references was an article that appeared in the well-respected Forbes magazine. I'm happy to edit the item anyway, but it would be good to know why such a reliable source wasn't seen as good enough so that I can avoid repeating the same mistake

Thanks

Peter Jenney (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Forbes clearly is a reliable source, but it's the only reliable third-party source provided (the interview with the CEO clearly is not independent coverage). Usually three to five reliable third-party sources are considered the minumum for a Wikipedia article. Worse, almost half the draft was one lengthy quote from Forbes, raising issues of copyright. I'd also say the tone is rather promotional, and parts of the content are not verifiable from the given references. Huon (talk) 19:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

✅ ...Huon addressed issue.

afc
please be careful with the decline reason "not plot" ,you have used it, for example  on Draft:Asia Pacific Visionwhich is a real media company. It applies only to works of fiction or about characters in fiction. You are presumably using the afch script--the script in its present form make it very easy to make that particular error.  DGG ( talk ) 10:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my inactivity. Thanks for letting me know, DGG. --JustBerry (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

✅

Favor?
Hello there! I've a favor to ask. I just noticed that the Sophie Hunter page has an external image which is outdated. The photo from IMDB was from 2011 but there's a newly uploaded photo that is more suitable, taken just this month. This one http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1259206656/tt2084970. I hope you can help in changing it (or removing it altogether as I don't think it's necessary at all). Thank you very much!41.203.187.145 (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks like the image has been removed since you've posted the message. Let me know if you need anything else. --JustBerry (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

✅

Please comment on Talk:Autism
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Autism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:73 (number)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:73 (number). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic calendar
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

call for help/support to improve a draft
Hi, thanks for your fine editorial work

My profile is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AlexisMichaud

A few months ago you reviewed a page I had submitted for creation.

All the pages I started got tagged for speedy deletion. Then after some exchanges with the reviewers of the pages, and some additions to the pages, they eventually got accepted.

For the latest page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:St%C3%A9phane_Michaud you advised me to rework it and resubmit it in the Spring. I made some additions in late July. In the new version, references to publications (including some available online on JSTOR etc) were added. But the submission was rejected again, on the same grounds: lack of notability.

There might be a bias here. Some persons are better represented online than others, but this does not relate in any straightforward way to their real importance in their field. What one expects of a true scholar is that they do their work quietly and productively and don't focus on the "rat race" for honours, recognition and public attention. The person at issue has made and continues to make a strong and lasting influence in his field, as evidenced (among other indicators) by the reviews published about his books. A leading scholar in his field certainly deserves to be on Wikipedia?

I realized that someone had written a stub about me and it had not been deleted, although the "fame" is nowhere comparable to that of the characters for whom I have written Wikipedia pages, which had some difficulty being accepted. This time the draft I wrote for a prominent scholar has been "blanked" altogether, which does not look like an encouragement to edit further. I'd love to be in touch to find ways to remedy this.

Apologies for the trouble, and many thanks for your help

AlexisMichaud (talk) 06:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello AlexisMichaud, I apologize for my inactivity. I have returned! Do you still need any guidance? --JustBerry (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your notes, and great that you are back! In the meantime the draft has found its way into Wikipedia, and all is well! No need for extra guidance so far. All best, AlexisMichaud (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Big data
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Big data. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:International Space Station
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International Space Station. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Azure
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azure. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ken Ham
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ken Ham. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julian calendar
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Julian calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lloviu virus
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lloviu virus. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 in spaceflight
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2015 in spaceflight. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Los Angeles Fire Department
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Los Angeles Fire Department. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Einstein Cross
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Einstein Cross. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lift (force)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lift (force). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syngenta
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syngenta. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cyclone Pam
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cyclone Pam. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Higgs boson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Higgs boson. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foie gras
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foie gras. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:E-meter
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:E-meter. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1692 Subbotina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1692 Subbotina. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Magneto (generator)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Magneto (generator). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tensor
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tensor. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brown rice
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brown rice. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abbas-class submarine
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abbas-class submarine. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corona del Mar High School
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corona del Mar High School. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Traian Vuia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Traian Vuia. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Henry of Isenburg-Covern
Hello JustBerry, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Henry of Isenburg-Covern, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Heads of state are usually deemed notable, it is certainly an assertion of importance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  04:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)