User talk:JustInn014

Hey buddy
its me, poppinoncrackvideos. thanks for fixing my sth-10 article. it is much better now. ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinreturns (talk • contribs) 17:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thunderbolt siren, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Thunderbolt siren was changed by JustInn014 (u) (t) deleting 10153 characters on 2009-02-06T20:04:56+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:EOWS612.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EOWS612.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Malone, Wisconsin image
I noticed your image edit to Malone, Wisconsin. Let me know here if you want to talk with a human about your questions. Please be careful to only upload images that you took yourself.  Royal broil  12:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The image in question is File:MaloneCoop.jpg. I know all about Malone, I took all of the other pictures & I created the article. I am very familiar with The Holyland (Wisconsin)! You're right, the elevator is quite prominent and I agree it is a landmark in Malone. The picture is scheduled to be deleted on August 28th if you don't do something about it. Licensing is a long an complicated topic; many people are confused about it. For the license to be allowable for Wikipedia use, it would have to be licensed in a free use license. So anyone would need to be able to use it, even for commercial use! So if that bothers you (which is a reasonable think to be bothered by!) then don't upload the picture. As the photographer, you own the copyright. So you can assign everything from all rights reserved down to releasing all rights to public domain. So if your goal is to protect the image, then you should let it get deleted. I'll drive through Malone some day, especially while there's the 151 detour, and get a shot if you feel there should be one. If you do decide to keep the image here, I suggest using the cc-by-sa-2.5, which is the most restrictive license allowed. It restricts someone else's usage of the image by making them attribute you as the author, and it required an derivative of the image to use the same license as you have selected. You can read a much more thorough explanation at Image copyright tags. Cheers!  Royal broil  22:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please add a comment to the description that you took the image yourself - something like "I took this image myself", which is our way to assert that you own the copyright. Otherwise, the license looks good! Thanks for your contribution, and let me know if you ever have any questions. If I don't know the answer, I should be able to point you in the right direction. As you can see, lots of people follow my talk page.  Royal broil  02:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page American Signal Corporation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page American Signal Corporation. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Thunderbolt Article
Hi Justin. Yes, the article was mostly written by kiddies, along with a lot of other siren-related articles, see STH-10 Siren. Also the Thunderbolt article has been know to be full of fancruft for a while now. Also, don't be afraid to be bold in making your edits; if it looks like it needs to be fixed, fix it! Ginbot86 21:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

STH-10 Picture
Hi Justin, is it possible you could get a closer-up and higher-quality photo of an STH-10 for the article? The current one's too grainy and small. Ginbot86 03:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on List of sirens built by Alerting Communicators of America. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Wikipedia is a community of editors and as such, all articles are subject to editing and revision by any number of editors. Please refrain from discouraging or hindering the editing of articles by individuals other than yourself. Thank you. '' Cindamuse (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ACA Cyclone
A tag has been placed on ACA Cyclone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 12:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Cross-namespace redirect
Please do not create redirects from article space into other namespaces, such as user space, as you did with American Signal Corporation. Wikipedia's mainspace, where articles are made public, is separate from the various background namespaces for editors to use in the course of work on the encyclopaedia, so your redirect has been reverted. In addition, it is not normally acceptable to completely remove the whole text of a long-established article, worked on by numerous editors, and substitute a new one of your own without first discussing the change on the article's talk page and establishing a consensus to do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I have now found that the same applies to List of sirens built by Alerting Communicators of America. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to create malicious redirects, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I wrote the above comments in the belief that your edits were done in good faith, and that you simply were not aware of the way Wikipedia works. However, further study of your editing history has made it abundantly clear that your redirects were a deliberate attempt to evade the decision reached at Articles for deletion/American Signal Corporation, and unilaterally over-ride that decision. I also see that you have a prolonged history of troublesome editing in connection with American Signal Corporation, that you have been warned before about your ownership attitude to articles, and that you have even resorted to outright vandalism in order to be disruptive when consensus does not go your way, as in this edit. Wikipedia works by collaboration and consensus, not by individual editors who believe they know best persisting with disruption until they get their way. If you cannot or will not work collaboratively then Wikipedia is not the place for you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ACA Cyclone


The article ACA Cyclone has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable outside of the siren fanbase, article is all trivia with no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MikeM2011 (talk) 02:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ACA Hurricane


The article ACA Hurricane has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable subject for its own article since not many people outside of the siren community know about it. No references, all trivia, and many grammatical errors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MikeM2011 (talk) 02:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:STH10firesiren.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:STH10firesiren.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Federal 500 siren


The article Federal 500 siren has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails GNG: Unable to identify any independent, reliable sources in any language offering more than a trivial mention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — swpb T 19:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)