User talk:Just an onlooker

Hello

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Mig77(t) 15:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Dear sir, your positive contibutions are very much appriciated, please continue adding well reasoned and verifiable content. However, your personal attack on David in Talk:Vegetarianism is not appreciated, and indicates that you may be here for emotional and not encyclopedic reasons. Please keep emotions to positive ones, and assume good faith. --Mig77(t) 08:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Talk:Vegetarianism appear to contain comments which other people may consider offensive or personal. Please make sure that you follow Wikipedia's policy of no personal attacks and keep to discussing the content of articles, rather than focusing on other editors. I hope you can resolve any disagreements and enjoy working with other editors to improve Wikipedia. Thanks, Davidjk (msg+edits) 22:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Vegetarianism
Hehe. If you want a good POV fight, you can look up on several animal right related articles which are worse. But you should remember that "Wikipedia is not a battleground". Anyway, your edits about different type of protein are quite informative. I used to think that there are only one type of protein. Thanks. :) Vapour


 * With regards to the Vegetarianism article, your contributions are great, but what you'd written could be interpreted as slightly misleading. I've reworded some of the last paragraph to better reflect the citation's conclusion (as far as I can tell, anyway). If you don't agree with my changes, go ahead and revert them, and say why on the talk page, or discuss it with me. Thanks, Davidjk (msg+edits) 09:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Vegetarian Edits
I have just read your slight changes to my edits. Good Job. You actually agree with me. Then I read your comments in the talk page. Someone may misinterpret your comments that you still disagree with my contributions. I hope you are not playing it both sides and trying to encourage another editor to delete our collaborated contributions. Please correct your comments in the talk page because you actaually agree with me based on your edits. Or archive it. Happy editing, --Just an onlooker 20:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I've updated the talk page to say that we agree on the article as-is (or at least the additions you made and I edited). To clarify, my comment was made before I edited the article, so it didn't really apply any more (and I'm not sure why I posted it... chalk that one up to universities having a cheap bar). Glad to see the article improved, and thanks for your collaboration - hopefully you'll apply your knowledge to some more articles :)
 * Happy editing. Thanks, Davidjk (msg+edits) 21:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Minor Edits
Hi. Please make sure that you only mark changes as a minor edit when you are making small changes to spelling, grammar or layout. Edits which change the content of a page are always major. Thanks, Davidjk (msg+edits) 09:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vegetarianism article has been damaged.
The information you and I collaborated on has been altered and changed. I consider it borderline vandalism. Please add back in your version that was clear and easy to read. Now the information has entire weasel sentences instigated by a user who seems to be disruptive. Your version that you edited was easy to understand. Now it is hard to read and confusing. Thank You. --Just an onlooker 17:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Since the user who made the changes is currently involved in an investigation of sockpuppetry involving yourself, to avoid creating an unpleasant situation, I'm going to leave the article as it is for now. I'll work on a more "agreeable" version of that section in the meantime. Thanks, Davidjk (msg+edits) 19:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'd welcome constructive criticism to the edits made. Saying its "altered" or "damaged" doesn't really help improve the article. Also Just an onlooker, please familiarize yourself with what is considerd vandalism. Adding a referenced fact is not vandalism. Please be clear on what Wikipedia considers vandalism and especially what is not vandalism before throwing this word around. Thank you. Yankees76 19:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks and civility
Now that you have been proven via WP:RFCU to be a sockpuppet of and other accounts. Note that this is your last warning regarding making personal attacks and acting uncivil on Wikipedia. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars. Also creating new sockpuppets to circumvent policy and avoid scrutiny from other editors is a forbidden use of sock puppets on Wikipedia. See WP:SOCK This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Yankees76 19:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)