User talk:Just searching77

Lashkar-e-Taiba
If you de-link a "See also", you probably should remove the item as it is useless without being linked. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

All links restored
All the links you removed have been restored. Please do not do it again. WWGB (talk) 10:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm TheOriginalSoni. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2008 Mumbai attacks because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ''Removal of links, as you have been doing, is not correct. Please refrain from doing so. '' TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User:Mhi, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 16:27, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lashkar-e-Taiba, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Ron h jones (Talk) 01:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

My Talk Page
You have made inappropriate changes to my user page, and talk page. You may of course leave me messages on my talk page, but that's not what you did, your changes where nothing more than vandalism. Please stop.

As for your other edits, why not discuss your proposed changes on the Talk Pages of the articles in question and get consensus on it? It makes sense for you to do so, as then your changes stand a reasonable chance of not being reverted. The way you are going about it now will only eventually piss off an Admin, who may decide to block your account for a "time out".

I'm curious as to why you want to delete references to Ajmal Kasab? He is relevent to all of the articles you have "edited", and there is no reason why his name should not be linked to his own article, in fact it's fairly standard. =//= Johnny Squeaky 15:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)