User talk:Justdd

Spam in Pandaism
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pandaism, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pandaism is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pandaism, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

question about that article
I did not have a chance to read your article about Pandaism before it was deleted. A brief search on Google turns up nothing substantial on the subject, but enough to intrigue me. I would like to see what you had written. Do you, perchance, have a copy saved somewhere? — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 09:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * No, I did not have a copy of my Pandaism article saved. I'd let you see it if I did. However, I'd like to thank you for asking. I will never again edit Wikipedia, nor is likely that I will log in again. I did not get a chance to insert said "hang on" tag nor did I get a clear explanation of what it was that was so wrong about my article. Furthermore, it is likely that I will not return to wikipedia at all and will take my information searching elsewhere on the internet. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justdd (talk • contribs) 2007-07-16T17:09:33 originally on a different page


 * Don't take it so hard. You may want to politely ask the admin who deleted the article, Darthgriz98, to undelete it long enough for you to copy it to a personal sandbox for further editing. While you're at it, you might solicit some feedback from him or Erechtheus as to why it looked like blatant advertising.


 * p.s. I have two suggestions related to talk page etiquette, as well. First, please sign your posts by adding four tildes ( ~ ) to the end of whatever you have to say. Second, when you reply to another editor, please do so on the same page. Take a look through the talk page guidelines for more tips on that subject.


 * Again, don't let this discourage you.  — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 21:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

RE:Pandaism
Well, I deleted the article not as spam, but for non-notability. If you can find more sources on it (see WP:NOTABILITY) it may be able to stand, but if there isn't much about it, especially since it is so new, it may not be able to stand. I'll move it to User:Justdd/Pandaism for you to work on outside of the mainspace until you can find more information on it. Darth Griz98  01:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)