User talk:JusticeAdvocate1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Investigating Innocence (January 5)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anup  Mehra  ✈ 14:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Investigating Innocence concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Investigating Innocence, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Investigating Innocence


Hello JusticeAdvocate1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Investigating Innocence".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked as a hoaxster
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Remember this thread? That source is considered a hoax here and you are trying to spread hoaxes. No thank you. You have some kind of conflict of interest to push that manure. Indeffed as a hoaxster that is NOTHERE.

Have you actually read the book? You seem to be basing your claim of unreliability on the idea that a serial killer cannot kill many people. This is obviously false. Since 2015 a 6-part documentary by A&E came out, which was reviewed by Rolling Stone. BTW: In the Ed Montgomery article, you removed a section citing the San Francisco Chronicle, are you suggesting that is not a reliable source? [ Apologies if this is not in right format, I don't understand wikipedia talk at all ]