User talk:Justiceforvictimsandsociety

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Justiceforvictimsandsociety. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Westminster paedophile group, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Arfæst Ealdwrítere –   talk!  15:30, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once you have read this warning, and commit to change your behaviour, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. I've blocked your account until such time you acknowledge this warning, then follow the instructions above. You may, under no circumstances, add content that is defamatory to a living person without citing a reliable source. Your four edits had to be suppressed as unsourced, negative, and if untrue, would be libel. This is not acceptable, and if unblocked, you should read the various policies, and follow them. Courcelles 23:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's going to need to be a more in depth explanation and response. You are not allow to WP:SOCK.  I've blocked User:Chappie12 for being your sockpuppet. Courcelles 23:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)