User talk:Justician22

January 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Community property has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Community property was changed by Justician22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929494 on 2019-01-14T18:19:08+00:00

June 2019
Hello, Justician22. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Also, we try hard to make sure articles have an encyclopedic tone and neutral point of view, citing reliable sources rather than personal opinion or original research. For these reasons, your recent edits have been removed.  JGHowes   talk  14:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trust law has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Trust law was changed by Justician22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953209 on 2019-07-05T14:24:36+00:00

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

A belated welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thank you very much. I greatly appreciate it, as I enjoyed editing very much. Justician22 (talk) 18:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Sibling
Modified your contributions to sibling, as they were correct from a valid perspective, I solely reworked them to fit both definitions of first, and second degree relatives. Please take a look.192.26.8.4 (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, kindly. Justician22 (talk) 18:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Law
Please do not insert your own opinions into articles about law. Claims about law should be cited to sources that explicitly support them. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

I wasn't under the impression that the Wikipedia definition of a living will was the actual text of law, nor did I think it would willfully pretend to be. Justician22 (talk) 18:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Are you implying your definition is the law????? Justician22 (talk) 18:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

I have news for you: Your definition is not the Law. However, keeping the expression of my opinion published is absolutely my constitutional rights of which you have violated and deprived me. Willful and intentional violations of constitutional rights are capital crimes. Justician22 (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)


 * You may wish to review No legal threats. I'm not particularly troubled by this threat; it was actually good for a laugh. However you should not press your luck. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Trustee—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Trustee, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ANM🐁(Talk/Contribs) 18:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trustee, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trustee. RacoonyRE (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The content under Hollywood Boulevard is showing my most recent editing. Strange. The corrections I am making are accurate. Justician22 (talk) 19:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

The content under Hollywood Boulevard is NOT showing my most recent editing. Strange. The corrections I am making are accurate. Justician22 (talk) 19:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Your edits continue to be reverted, even by people who do not know that you are blocked, because you continue to approach editing without any apparent consideration of a page's informative purpose and how your changes will affect that. So, for example, once again you made changes to the trust law article that added dubious, or at least jurisdiction-specific claims about trust distributions, while also removing the opening definition of the subject. You had two years to improve your reputation as an editor, but you continued to delete well-sourced material from articles and to substitute your own pet notions. Changing your reputation is not impossible, but it would require you to behave differently, especially by accepting that your own belief on a subject does not outweigh published scholarship. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)