User talk:Justif

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Nlu (talk) 06:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Baroness Cox
Please see Talk:Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox. I would like to know exactly what is deficient in the sources provided - they seem perfectly reliable to me. David | Talk 14:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

"Libel/False information"
Which bit exactly is libellous? Which bit is false? David | Talk 12:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * You have yet to explain this. David | Talk 19:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Three revert rule
You have just reverted Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox for the fourth time within 24 hours. That breaks the three revert rule. Your reverts are not justified under the WP:BLP policy because the information you are removing is not negative and is sourced. David | Talk 19:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletions
Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. David | Talk 14:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion again
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David | Talk 15:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR violation
I have reported your violation of the three revert rule here. David | Talk 15:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for a week for persistent vandalism. Do not remove sourced material from articles. --ajn (talk) 19:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * And you are now blocked for a month. --ajn (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)