User talk:Justin.E.Sutton

Problems with upload of File:File-Justin Eric Sutton Portrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:File-Justin Eric Sutton Portrait.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Justin.E.Sutton


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Justin.E.Sutton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I am shocked and amazed that my user page biography would be deleted like this!! I fully and completely contest its deletion and I wanted it fully restored. I created the biography in 2006 and now, out of the blue 16 years later it is just deleted without ANY notice?? Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The rules state clearly in the 1st Paragraph: " ...and, if desired, limited autobiographical and personal content. "
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages
 * My Biographical and Personal content has been WRONGFULLY REMOVED and Publicly ERASED and should be restored immediately. This is malicious abuse by summary arbitrary executive action of an 'Administrator' USER:FASTILY who today posted a large number of 'speedy deletions' of huge numbers of users without ANY respect to due-process or respect to the value of personal property where said publications are the personal property of the authors, each author now having been caused an injury in causation of such time and money burden upon each USER by the Administrator where each USER will be required to mount a defense and seek restitution for the unjust and arbitrary acts of an Administrator.   Said defense being initially the direct contestation of the arbitrary deletion of said 'Personal Content' while the 'Community' is witness to this transgression.
 * The content of my published biographical and personal information was not and could not be offensive to anyone as written in 3rd person reference to me personally.  1st Person, 3rd Person, whatever, it is still about the Person and that Person's Personal Content that was published on Wikipedia has now be un-published and REMOVED from WIKIPEDIA by cause of grammatical style choices??
 * The Administrator should NOT have the right to delete a USER Biography by arbitrary dislike of grammatical style or content. The USER should not have to ask permission from an Administrator to publish " if desired, limited autobiographical and personal content." as part of the publicly available USER Page.
 * This arbitrary power amounts to cyber-bullying AND blackmail where the cost born by the USER comes in having to mount a defense and proceed to win the case to have the original document republished as is, or to be forced to recreated the content under the threat of further arbitrary deletions.
 * As material evidence of the abuse of power and ongoing pattern abuse of an egotistical and enigmatic unknown masked wanna-be symbolic superhero the user page of the USER:Fastily (who deleted my personal biography, and many other publications) presents a USER page that has absolutely ZERO biographical information at all other than the ominous, narcissistic and perhaps psychotically dangerous and threatening statement, and I quote USER:Fastily: WITH GREAT POWER, THERE MUST COME GREAT RESPONSIBILITY
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fastily
 * I contend that the power of 'Administrator' has gone beyond reason and has become a dangerous and damaging power with USER:Fastily as illustrated in evidence by the embarrassingly stupid and arrogant USER:Fastily page publication, and I think USER:Fastily should be Speedy Deleted and REMOVED as administrator.
 * Now therefor I ASK THE WIKIPEDIA COMMUNITY to understand AND support my expectation that my USER:Justin.E.Sutton page be undeleted and restored at once! Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 21:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * For someone who is interested in the dictionary definitions of things, I am a little surprised to see "my user page was deleted" being equated to blackmail. Toning down the rhetoric a bit will do you more favours than claiming an administrator is somehow out to get you. Primefac (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You people are harassing me and causing me harm by taking me away from my work obligations.. That is financial harm, this is cyber bullying and you are abusing me.  You can NOT pretend deleting a user bio with personal information is not a personal attack. Tone it down?  THIS has robbed me of four hours of my life already!!!! Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 22:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You openly solicit me for favours???  You are blackmail me!! Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 22:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are choosing to use your time on a website that is run by volunteers, instead of doing your paid job as you claim, then the issue is with you and not us. How you spend your time is your concern and not ours. I am a fairly easy-going individual, but right now there are some folks on IRC who saw your earlier interactions and are calling to have you blocked; I am still attempting to get through to you that this is just a website, and if editing it and attempting to get your userpage undeleted is causing you financial and emotional stress, I highly, highly suggest walking away, taking a few days off, and coming back with a more open mind. Primefac (talk) 22:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I highly suggest you undelete it like you should! You know I followed the Rules.  You know this is abuse.
 * So... PrimeFac is also an unknown nobody, just like Fastily...  these two 'USERS' with Biographic information totally absent and totally made-up names.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Primefac
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fastily
 * So these two as community leaders have taken it upon themselves to be Wikipedia Judge/Jury/Executioner to delete my Bio and have the audacity to suggest it is not personal.
 * Meanwhile, I, the person who created USER:Justin.E.Sutton who had actual biographical information and personal information published in MY User page it gets deleted by people with ZERO biographical information. Total Arbitrary Abuse of Power! Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you think there has been an administrative abuse of power, I would encourage you to email the Arbitration Commitee, who are one of the bodies that reviews administrator activity on Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * thank you Primefac I will do exactly that. Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 22:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Are you out of your mind? My personal publication gets deleted and you block me because I complain?  I have many plans to publish on Wikipedia which is why I created my user ID so many years ago.  I already have multiple websites and plan on putting them on Wikipedia in due time, but this abuse is ridiculous!  Here is a sample that I published years ago... which I plan to publish on Wikipedia when I want to, not when you tell me to, but when I want to.  This is MY information and it is not up to Blablubbs to tell me when to publish it on Wikipedia:
 * http://interstatetraveler.us/Reference-Bibliography/Scientific_Giants_in_history.htm Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * And that would be deleted under No Orignal Research. Honestly, take a break from Wikipedia for a while... - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 00:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * People publish lists on Wikipedia all the time... as if it is not original research?  It is a list of facts in date order.  But for some reason everyone wants to beat up Justin Sutton today...  Honestly, Rich, if someone wrongfully deleted your personal biography on Wikipedia, would you just think nothing of it?  Oh, I see, you are another NOBODY with an empty BS Biographical webpage... nothing to delete!!  a bunch of masked hoodlums with everything to hide and nothing to loose.  If you can't help the situation leave me alone and stop harassing me. Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There's no harassment here, sadly you seem to be guilty of Victim playing. If I'm a nobody, you must be too... who are you by the way, never heard your name before... as for 'empty BS Biographical webpage', Wikipedia is NOT your biographical webpage, nor should it be. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 00:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * IF some jerk Admin had not deleted my Bio you could have been able to read 'who' I am, but no, you instead defend CENSORSHIP like a nasty little phony baloney abusive interloper who has been directed to STOP HARASSING ME! I have been assaulted by having MY information WRONGFULLY DELETED with ZERO due-process by faceless tyrants who have ZERO credibility who, like you, have no real identity. For all anyone knows, you and Fastily are the same person faking out everyone with multiple fake IDs acting as a mercenary to destroy public records. Take note that it is my USER bio that was summarily deleted, I am a registered USER of Wiki along with God-only-knows how many other people; not an Admin, not an Editor, not anything else, just a USER.  Now I am being bullied, censored and harassed by jerks like you for defending my rights as a USER.  The rules are clearly stated, second sentence of the first paragraph, but YOU just think NOTHING of it as if it is just fine and dandy to ERASE people's personal information.  IF Wikipedia admins do not follow their own rules, this entire encyclopedia is corrupt and run by nefarious henchmen who seem to get joy and self-satisfaction causing harm to others. Like I said to you Rich STOP HARASSING ME!!  This is the SECOND TIME!  CEASE AND DESIST ALL FURTHER COMMUNICATIONS WITH ME! Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * FOR EVERYONE:
 * "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit."
 * Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
 * However, some nameless wackjobs with unsubstantiated fake IDs have engaged in self aggrandizement and appointed themselves Judge, Jury and Executioner and have abused this 'Free' encyclopedia that anyone can edit and have DELETED the published records of registered USER:Justin.E.Sutton without any reason other than arbitrary nonsensical concepts of what is, or is not, too much information posted in as Personal Autobiographical Information. The very headline title itself says that Wikipedia is a 'Free Encyclopedia', but some wackjobs have taken possession of Administrative Powers and have arbitrarily deleted personal information from this registered USER and GodOnlyKnows how many other innocent registered USERS have had their labor flushed down the toilet.  This is an Assault! Justin.E.Sutton (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 16:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Since you are using this page to make personal attacks and are not requesting unblock, I have removed your access. I suggest you seriously rethink your approach here. 331dot (talk) 16:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

In addition, "free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" does not mean "anyone may edit about any topic in any manner at any time without restriction". 331dot (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

-- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * yo, it was deleted under U5   :)   SN54129  17:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Yo-yo, the content was clearly promotional. Fastily always deletes user pages as WP:U5, no matter how obviously WP:g11. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * if you mean an admin regularly misuses D-batch, I agree that that's another discussion; I merely feel that G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators is likely to create more confusion when G11 hasn't previously been mentioned. Support your latest box though :)   SN54129  18:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Bah. User:Deepfriedokra/U5 does work better. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Heavens forfend! I would never mean such a thing. The current educational notice works better anyway. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)



I'm sorry, but I or another admin have deleted content from your user space.

User pages and User talk pages are intended only to promote collegiality among users. They are not to be used as a soapbox for writings not connected with the editorial process on Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and Nor are user pages intended to host articles, CV's/resumés or lengthy autobiographies. Wikipedia is not a promotional venue or a place to post ads. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia ~ subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. For article creation, Please use WP:AfC and/or request help at the TEAHOUSE. You can also seek help via IRC chat.
 * not a free webhosting service ,
 * not a personal website,
 * not a blog
 * not a social media site

More information on user pages is available at THIS PAGE. Thank you. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC) -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Without revealing stuff you are not allowed to... was it mostly the same rhetoric as on this TP? - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 15:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Politeness prevents me from further categorizing. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)