User talk:Justin.chien

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard Pliner concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard Pliner, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Edouard Pliner


Hello Justin.chien. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Edouard Pliner.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 19:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard Pliner. JohnCD (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard Pliner concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard Pliner, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard Pliner


Hello Justin.chien. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Edouard Pliner".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Evguenia Zelikova


A tag has been placed on Evguenia Zelikova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Justin. The most important reason this article was deleted is because it appeared to about a living person that did not contain any independent references from reliable sources at all. Without references, there is no way to know whether the article was created with malicious intent. I assume you created the article without malicious intent but without references, how do we know that? A secondary consideration here is whether Jane/Evguenia may not pass the "notability" test for inclusion of people on Wikipedia, guided by the "WP:NOTINHERITED" essay about whether people associated with them (in this case, coaches, spouses and students) can support an assertion of notability. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions about this in particular, or anything else related to the English language Wikipedia. --Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking time to clarify what is going on here. I do understand someone has to be "notable" to have a Wiki page here. I was hoping to establish a page and slowly add more information. Some information I collected is in Russian, which is not my native language. It will take time to sort out how to better provide the informatoin. Still, her (Evguenia Zelikova or Jane Pliner) to the figure skating world are visible. I understand I need to provide more information! The first two parts I can connect (easily) is one of her formal students who is now one of the best coaches in the world does list Jane as her teacher in her wiki page (Link: Eteri Tutberidze). As you mentioned, she was the wife of another well-know coach Edouard Pliner who passed away now. They have partnered to develop some great skaters/coaches. I started Edouard's wiki page here and was getting the same inquiry. Fortunately, someone assisted in building the materials with what I put in. I am hoping, there will be other collaborators will can contributes for this page to get it started, while I am compiling additional information. Any assistance from anyone will be greatly appreciated! Justin.chien (talk) 15:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)