User talk:JustinBreithaupt

Hi JustinBreithaupt. I've deleted your userpage as it seemed to me to exist solely to promote yourself and your activities. You had no edits to any Wikipedia space outside your own userspace. If you want to help us out by improving our articles your contributions would be most welcome. We can't, however, permit you to use Wikipedia's resources (provided to us by charitable donation) as a free webhost. Regards, EyeSerene talk 20:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I guess I'm confused. Famous people like Richard Stallman, Linus Torvalds, and Bill Gates have their own pages and they are responsible fore operating systems and software. I'm not advertising anything for profit. I'm simply listing myself as the creator of JULinux as they are listed for GNU, Linux, and Microsoft's Windows. So what's the problem? I don't see what I did wrong. There are other Justin's who listed themselves simply for music they preformed. So why do they get to promote their music that's for profit, when I'm simply listing myself as the creator of JULinux? I guess I have no idea what the problem is. Before I simply tried listing JULinux on an existing Wikipedia page that listed Linux Distributions as user usacomputertec, but they told me that there were two reasons I couldn't do this. For one they said JULinux wasn't famous enough at the time even though it has over 4000 new users every day, and they said my user name was promoting my company USA COMPUTER TECH even though I use that user name for all my accounts. If you ask me your rules and the way you enforce them make it impossible for anyone to contribute without getting their heads blown off, unless they are really ritch. I feel discriminated against. Maybe I should consult the Open Invention Network's Lawyer firm that has volunteered to represent my Linux distribution? What is it going to take for my content not to be deleted? Hmmm, maybe you could type it for me, and then another moderator could look at it and disagree with you and delete it too?

It seems that playing by the rules on the Wikipedia gets you no where. This is why in the past I tried to start my own Wikipedia for people who wanted a truly free Wikipedia where anyone could post content without getting flamed as long as they followed our very simple rules, and I never had to ban anyone.

We called it PediaOpeness and we got a call from Wikipedia's lawyer firm that tried to threaten us and tell us we had to change the name. You guys sure aren't friendly for a charity, and you don't like competition. You guys are the opposite of Open Source and Friendly, and you make people like me who fight for open source freedoms very angry!

Oh ya P.S. it appears from looking at the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distributions that once had hundreds of Linux distributions listed, that only a select few are allowed to be listed now. Why are they favored over anyone else's? Why can't mine be listed there? (JustinBreithaupt (talk) 19:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC))