User talk:Justin Milton/Quantum teleportation

Peer review:

The current lead section for the article is good. Be sure that you add a bit to it to include your contributions. I like the planned layout for your additions. From this point, I would continue adding information on Bouwmeester's experiment including the outcome and an explanation of how this supported the theory. I would also include the impact of the experiment on the field. Then, of course, you should provide the same information for Boschi's experiment. I would also recommend finding a place to compare and contrast the experiment's methods, results, and conclusions.

Another thing to consider is linking the two researcher's names to their respective Wikipedia articles if they have them.

The pieces that you have decided to add are filling in a gap in the current article which will help improve the articles balance and accuracy.

Your content is neutral and fact based and your references are from reliable and unbiased sources so no worries about that.

MAllison5 (talk) 00:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Peer review:

Your content is relevant, however, I think you would also do well to expand upon the experiments and results that are already present in the article. It's good to go over history in your experiments, but there are a lot more recent experiments and results than what you have present, and you may find that some attention can get paid to that too.

There are a good amount of sources present in your draft.

The links work. There's not really a way to bias information here, so there's no issue regarding biased information.

As stated before, these experiments listed are fairly old, and many more have been done since then. Finding good experiments to review that have been done within the last few years may be a great way to contribute to this section of the article.

Broccccoli (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)