User talk:Justin Tsay

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to THOMAS (neuroscience), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: THOMAS (neuroscience) was changed by Justin Tsay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913228 on 2010-11-29T18:45:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of THOMAS (neuroscience) for deletion
The article THOMAS (neuroscience) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/THOMAS (neuroscience) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Rumping (talk) 09:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)