User talk:Justincantafio

Hi Justin, sorry your page is up for speedy deletion, the person who tagged it must think the article doesn't meet WP:BIO, which I hope you'll read. Please don't remove the tags, the admin who finds it will look at the article to see whether it meets speedy deletion criteria. Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. Thanks for editing! Peace, delldot | talk 22:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

...That would be me, and it does meet crieterion A7. Melchoir 22:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello! Justin Cantafio is not the appropriate place to post information about yourself, because it is in the part of Wikipedia where encyclopaedic articles are written. A "userpage" at User:, however, is available for personal information about yourself. When adding personal information please remember that Wikipedia is not myspace. Your userpage is for anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It is a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Please see Introduction and User page for more information. FreplySpang 23:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Penis. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 02:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. But…
…I've added the "" template to your user page (User:Justincantafio), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).

Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as personal homepage or used as a general webhosting service, but as way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

If you wish to contribute directly to Wikipedia and your page has already been deleted, you can ask any admin to undelete and restore it: if necessary, leave me a message and I'll pass on your request. To begin editing, here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Don't write about yourself
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you, and happy editing. Calton | Talk 08:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Claritism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Claritism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Claritism. Jfire (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Claritism
An editor has nominated Claritism, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)