User talk:Justinevierra/sandbox

I don't see your article evaluation here. BootsGordon (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Article Evaluation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocket_veto The opening sentence is broad because it's applying to different countries policies on what has to happen for the president to veto an item. However, in this statement, it mentions nothing about different countries handling vetoes differently. It provides examples which are useful to the reader, but I think adding some history about the pocket veto could be useful to the article. Brief the reader more of the relevance and reason for using this method. Everything I read in the article seemed relevant. Nothing appeared to be biased There is a strong list of references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinevierra (talk • contribs) 14:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Article Selection
1. Pocket Veto a. add history 2. Granting Pardons a. add more information/ background to countries where it's lacking 3. Department of the Interior a. brief on the "broad range of responsibilities" carried on by the department of interior b. all of its importance on certain issues through out the years c. more information about the American Indian issues the department handles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinevierra (talk • contribs) 14:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

=Tessa's peer review= Hi Justine, just a couple of notes I made while reading your article. I think you should add a bit more about presidents and their history with the use of pocket vetos. I think you should include some specifics of pocket vetoes as well such as what were the specifics of the bill that the president used the pocket veto on. I also think you should discuss and elaborate more the significance of the pocket veto compared to the regular veto and why presidents opt-in to use these vetoes. also, don't forget to cite your citations at the bottom as a footnote. Overall this is a good start and should be an interesting topic to research and write about!Tthomas20 (talk) 03:42, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Robert's Peer Review
Hello, I would say that this is a good start. The info provided is neutral and easy to understand and the sources seem to be legit. I would maybe add stuff on maybe some of the more important things/bills/decisions that were pocket vetoed or if there are any examples where a pocket veto has failed or been ruled against by the court. Other than that, I don't see too much else that needs adding or editing. Good luck editing. Jones Robert (talk) 01:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)