User talk:JustinianCorrectus

August 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jingiby I think the removal of mt edits was a mistake. I have been recently re-reading the book in question and I stumbled upon a passage in the wikipedia article which is seriously mislleading and uses certain quotes deriving from studies of the book without the required context, and more importantly without the proper explanation of the author's true intentions. I find it funny that you have found my revisions non constructive when in reality certain paragraphs from the wikipedia article are the ones that appear extremely non constructive, missleading, and to be honest, are allarmingly close to propaganda which i can easily recognize being closely familiarized with the question at hand. I would invite you to read the book in question if you are interested so that you can witness personally what i am talking about. On the other hand I want to offer my honest support in reviewing the question if there is need for it, what i mean to say by this is that I am open to any questions you might have. Having said this i will try to familiarize myself more closely with the policies of wikipedia before making other edits (because this was essentialy a spontaneous edit caused by a casual encounter with missleading information in the wikipedia article) and I hope we can avoid any further removal of my edits, and that we can get a more fact and 'direct quote' based article that is unbiased and does not include propaganda. I also want to point out that although I am in no hand u biased, being directly involved in the matter at hand, my intentions are in no way to twist the truth, quite the contrary, my goal is to come as close as possible to the truth by continuously educating myself on the matter and having a strong and argumented basis for any beliefs I might hold and that may influence my future actions. I hope that such a spirit will be reflected in the arricle at hand as well. Kind regards! JustinianCorrectus (talk) 15:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)