User talk:Justinjsp

Nomination of Barbara Jayne Orser for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Jayne Orser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barbara Jayne Orser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Entrepreneurial feminism


The article Entrepreneurial feminism has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Content Fork. No need for this article. Perhaps merge into the feminism article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Feminine capital


The article Feminine capital has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Content Fork. No need for this article. Perhaps merge into the feminism article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of Entrepreneurial feminism
Please do not result to personal attacks as you did when removing my PROD from Entrepreneurial feminism. I am not 'targeting' all of the related articles. You brought them to my attention in the recent AfD and I therefore looked them over. They seem inappropriate as standalone articles as they are WP:content forks that are unlikely to be visited by anyone and their content would be much better served merged into one of the larger and more highly trafficked articles. More articles is not necessarily better, as it fragments information and makes it difficult for interested readers to find the information. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

The students studying feminism, entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurial feminism (present in different academic fields: sociology, feminist studies, women's studies, business, entrepreneurship) might find it relevant and having them as standalone articles also allows for Professor Orser's students to find them. The other articles have been reviewed by others and were approved. Please refrain from going on the attack. She is relevant as one of Canada's 100 most powerful women, an author, vice-dean of a prestigious university faculty at one of Canada's top 15 (read Ivy-league) universities.

Nomination of Feminine capital for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feminine capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Feminine capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Entrepreneurial feminism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Entrepreneurial feminism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Entrepreneurial feminism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi!
I see you're a new editor. I've done a little work on your Barbara Jayne Orser article. I added some references. It's really important to have good references that are independent of the subject. Do you have other references you can use? :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

I do not, at the moment, but my partner might. Thank you for your assistance! I appreciate your work to help me improve the article. Suggestions and improvements are always welcome. Cheers! {talk} 18:03, 14 September 2016 (EDT)


 * Cool. It will be good to have other sources. In addition, try not to take the Articles for Deletion process personally. The process is a debate format where editors need to present information dispassionately. Sometimes AfD gets ugly, true, but it's better to try to handle it calmly. When I first got involved, I watched how others handled the process and modeled my own behavior on their (good) examples. If you find yourself getting frustrated, reach out for help. I work with WikiProject Women in Red here on Wikipedia where we focus on the creation of new articles relating to women. There are a lot of great editors you can talk with on the talk page. It's very active. Since you have a focus on feminism, you might find that a good place to vent. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)