User talk:Justinpond76/sandbox

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I think your article is a great topic, the layout is done very well and the fact that you touched on many topics or examples of friends with benefits was great. The different articles under film and television and the music section with a song called friends with benefits was great as well. Overall, the articles about the movies were clearly written and talk to the topic.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? When it comes to things to make your work even better, I would expand on the definition and probably go a different route with overarching topics. The film television and music are good but I think it would be better if you replace those with other overarching topics like friends with benefits in the workplace, friends with benefits in social media, friends with benefits when it comes to insider trading and things of that nature.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? I would also say, instead of going with the different types of friends with benefits i.e. film and television and music, go with friends with benefits in the workplace or in society. I think that would narrow your topic a bit and you can build a single wiki page based on that. That would provide specific information that matches the definition at the top of the page. The definition refers to otherwise platonic friends who engage in a casual sexual relationship but then it goes into the different examples of friends with benefits, film and television and music. I went to the UA library and searched friends with benefits and there are a ton of information to help you focus your topic. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! I like the overall layout of the article once you click on it but it was very similar to mine. The fact that it was referenced very well makes me want to go through my article to get that squared away.

Justin, If you have any other questions, feel free to email me and I can go through this with you or clarify what I have presented as options. Jeremy

Justin Peer Review
First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I think your article is a great topic, the layout is done very well and the fact that you touched on many topics or examples of friends with benefits was great. The different articles under film and television and the music section with a song called friends with benefits was great as well. Overall, the articles about the movies were clearly written and talk to the topic.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? When it comes to things to make your work even better, I would expand on the definition and probably go a different route with overarching topics. The film television and music are good but I think it would be better if you replace those with other overarching topics like friends with benefits in the workplace, friends with benefits in social media, friends with benefits when it comes to insider trading and things of that nature.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? I would also say, instead of going with the different types of friends with benefits i.e. film and television and music, go with friends with benefits in the workplace or in society. I think that would narrow your topic a bit and you can build a single wiki page based on that. That would provide specific information that matches the definition at the top of the page. The definition refers to otherwise platonic friends who engage in a casual sexual relationship but then it goes into the different examples of friends with benefits, film and television and music. I went to the UA library and searched friends with benefits and there are a ton of information to help you focus your topic.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! I like the overall layout of the article once you click on it but it was very similar to mine. The fact that it was referenced very well makes me want to go through my article to get that squared away. Justin, If you have any other questions, feel free to email me and I can go through this with you or clarify what I have presented as options. Jeremy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjdavison (talk • contribs) 01:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)