User talk:Justmor1

Criticism sections
Hi Justmor1. I have put back a couple of criticism sections you took out of a couple of articles, because i think that you were premature to do so. Perhaps discussion on the talk pages would be better. Happy days, LindsayHello 15:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Incidentally, i see that it looks as though no one has welcomed you, so i am about to do so :)

Hi Lindsay, thanks for your message! FYI I was the one that put up that text and those photos regarding those four folks from Tesco. I just deleted the text and photos today because it is no longer accurate, and because the supporting citations (weblinks) for each of those pieces of information is no longer online. So it's both no longer accurate and there is also no longer any online citations connecting these folks to that issue (and also the issue was since resolved).

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justmor1 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Repeated content removal on Tesco-related articles
You've copy-pasted more or less the same reason elsewhere, but you don't need to add lies to it too. "Also, they were websites I had created myself" - you really own 5 different websites attributed to several people? I find that highly doubtful. Also, only two of the links are dead, and they exist in the internet archive ( and ). I really should've checked that earlier, but still - the links are perfectly valid, it still happened, and there's no point in removing it because it isn't the case any more. Instead, edit that in with links to back it up. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️  (She/her) (talk ) 18:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The two dead URLs are now replaced with archived versions. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️  (She/her) (talk ) 18:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Olivia, first of all yes, I do own TescoMalaysia.com as well as the domain name for the person referenced in this Wiki post. I run the non-profit that put both of those sites up. Second, I wasn't saying that literally every link is no longer active, I was saying the links that connect the issue to this person are no longer active/online and not archived. Third, the archived link you say you found (not TescoMalaysia.com, the other one) has nothing to do with this issue whatsoever, it's just a random article about Tesco from two years ago it looks like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justmor1 (talk • contribs) 12:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Please, do not remove the controversy sections again without talking about it. I would suggest on the talk page of one of the three articles would be the place to initiate that conversation.
 * I have to point out to you that when you edited the articles originally, you clicked and agreed that "By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license" which pretty much means that you no longer control what you wrote, that others can use it, even if you want it removed. Now, i have adjusted the references which needed it, and yes, there are references for the statements made, so please, do not act foolishly.  Courtesy ping for  Happy days, LindsayHello 15:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * What is the name of the non-profit that you run? Is it Lever Foundation? --kingboyk (talk) 21:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.