User talk:Juzzi0

Proposed deletion of Charlestown United


The article Charlestown United has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Three year old article that has failed to establish notability of the subject

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (talk) 11:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Charlestown United
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Charlestown United. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Charlestown United. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Cufc.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Cufc.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Cufc.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Cufc.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlestown United, you will be blocked from editing. You should also familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's "No personal attacks" policy. AussieLegend (talk) 06:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Pascal.Tesson. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 06:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

*Haha, after all that I can still do what I want? Brilliant. Anyway, hurry up and delete Charlestown United, if you morons all think it should be deleted, why isn't it? Juzzi0 (talk) 08:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * We follow a process here. There must be consensus to delete. However, if you're happy to have it deleted, you can always try blanking the page and replacing the content with . You should also not take things to heart and go on vandalism rampages as you did earlier. You also need to be mindful of WP:NPA if you intend continuing to edit here. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)