User talk:Jvicens.pf

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cate Blanchett, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  10:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Caan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Repeating edits to various articles without summaries or rationales as requested a number of times. Light show (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Cate Blanchett. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please don't make changes to the image without discussing first.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  02:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2015
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

December 2016
This is a warning. To change the caption of a picture in an article, the language at the picture file has to support your change. You've been adding your own original research to images in a lot of articles where the language does not support your change to the caption. If you continue to do that, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ice Age: Collision Course. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 20:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Carla Bruni. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  22:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2017
Hello, I'm L3X1. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. L3X1 (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at 1998, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''
 * namely image overload per section &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(ring-ring)''  23:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 23:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Zoolander 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Can you explain why you're making the same exact kinds of edits as the blocked user ? Joanpuig2001 also blanked sourced content in film articles, and she constantly added her own analysis to reception sections. These seem to be your main edits lately. Are you related to that account in some way? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Given that you've continued to make the same exact edits as without any explanation, I've indefinitely blocked this account. If you can explain to another administrator why your edits look exactly the same as hers, maybe you can get unblocked. For example: ritualistically changing the wording in reception sections ( and ) and blanking content in release sections and using the improper tense "has grossed" ( and ). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)