User talk:Jvol

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Happy Editing, J Klein my page my talk my contributions
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Extra tildes ("~")
You've been adding the four tildes to your edit summaries, unnecessarily as you can see here. Your user name is noted automatically on the edits, there. The place where you need to use the tildes (as correctly presented by JKlein above) is on talk pages like this one. I'll be putting the prescribed four at the end of this note. They're what then will translate into the time-marked "signature" on the note. ... Cheers and welcome! Swliv (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

got it. thanks Jvol (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * On the deleted-page problem, that is more involved. It's the more difficult because the normal links to other interested users are (often) deleted along with the page (though you seem to have seen some history or other). If you look at my User talk:Swliv/Archive01 you'll see some of what I've gone through on that general front (Security Industry; bit-something ...; oh, yeh, the "speedy delete" run here. Boy that one got my heart beating. (While the subject herself ... may seem "small" ... the subject of a GM bankruptcy at the time I was working on it ... felt cutting edge; as I may have said there.) Anyway, I'd look at your proposed subject if you'd like. There are more-senior editors who do from time to time help out; I noticed something to that effect at User:Obsidian Soul today; and have gotten bits of help myself along the way, though no "easy way" to recommend to you now. Keep at it one way or another. Did you appeal to the deleter? Query me again with specifics if you'd like. Good luck! Swliv (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, I'm Mlpearc Phone. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Star Trek: The Original Series episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc Phone ( open channel ) 02:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Star Trek
I’ve reverted the changes you made on the Star Trek page based on your odd belief that the word “franchise” is somehow derogatory. If you wish to make those changes, I suggest you go to the talk page to get consensus. I have never heard anyone refer to that term in a negative way. Rcarter555 (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hi Jvol! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Star Trek several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 04:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)