User talk:Jvstone

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Perception, Visual perception and several other articles. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Lova Falk    talk   17:27, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Jvstone/sandbox (January 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [.
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your draft article, User:Jvstone/sandbox


Hello Jvstone. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Constant314. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Machine learning have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Constant314 (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. Please reconsider in the context of the book's reviewer comments. Who said, for example:
 * "Authoritative, funny, and concise."
 * Steven Strogatz, Professor of Applied Mathematics, Cornell University
 * "Artificial Intelligence Engines will introduce you to the rapidly growing field of deep learning networks: how to build them, how to use them and how to think about them. James Stone will guide you from the basics to the outer reaches of a technology that is changing the world."
 * Professor Terrence Sejnowski, Director of the Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute, USA and author of The Deep Learning Revolution, MIT Press, 2018 Jvstone (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Those comments are not considered reliable sources. While the comments may be exactly what those reviewers said, it is often the case that they did not write the comments attributed to them.  That just the way it is in the publishing world.  But in any case, if you are one of the authors, you cannot add it to a Wikipedia article because of potential conflict of interest (WP:COI).  You are not considered reliable to judge your own work.  The way around it is to open a discussion on the talk page of the article, identify yourself, and ask other editors to consider adding it to the article. Constant314 (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)