User talk:Jvv62

Reverting Image copyright tag
I just reverted what was a very strange page that should have been a redirect. LaurieFoston seems to really like Michael cortson, whoever he is. -- jvv62

Praise
If I did something right, tell me here. -- Jvv62

Criticism
Please let me know when I goof on policy, style, or content. -- Jvv62

Welcome to the Team
I would just like to be the first to welcome you to the assessment team. I hope you have fun helping us a sses and feel you can vent your opinion when you dissagree with any of us. Don't be shy! Anyhow, I would also like to let you know that (if you care to use it) there is an assess-ment specific template that I wrote with standardizes the format of the assessments. No worries if you don't want to use it, I just find it usefull. Once again, Welcome. Adam McCormick 05:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed it is good to see more people on the team, there are a lot of articles that need rating so we need a lot of help. Enjoy assessing! Camaron1 | Chris 09:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Damn, I was going to be first! Victuallers 11:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

''Thank you all. I will try to be a really useful assessor.'' -- John

Henry Pratt Fairchild
"I was leaving some of the instructions in as a reminder of work to be done... "
 * I assumed it was left-over clutter, sorry if I wrecked your working layout ;-). But thanks for the interesting page, an marxist eugenicist as head of the American Sociological Society, wada'ya know... maarten 18:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Active user verification
Hello,. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:WPNN, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on WP:WPNN. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Diez2 23:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:St pats shield logo.jpg- FIXED
Thanks for uploading Image:St pats shield logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Fixed by TerriersFan

Discrepancy between Aga Khan II and Aga Khan III
Jvv62 - thanks for catching the discrepancy between these two articles. The Aga Khan III article has been corrected and a credbible source cited. Regards Cimm[talk] 19:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:HPFairchild.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HPFairchild.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)