User talk:Jw 193

Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Requests for permissions/Denied/November 2008. SoxBot X (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Gamelatron
You're very quick to delete. I thought that the world's first & only robotic Gamelan was worthy of having a wiki as this is the FIRST & ONLY instrument, or robot like it. I wrote a small piece on it & an being plagued with questions. Normally I push them toward the wiki, in this case you think it's not even worthy enough to have a wiki? Engineers, musicians, and fans of technology would find this of interest. If certain deep fried foods are worthy, I was sure that this would be. I had only just begun work on it & you deleted it 2 minutes after the first save. What a shame. Please take the time to research Mechanical Instruments & let me know how you distinguish which ones are worthy of keeping on wiki. --Prettydigital (talk) 18:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry to hear that your Gamelatron article was deleted. I believe you meant to contact NawlinWiki (talk).  I did not see your article and certainly did not delete it.--Jw 193 (talk) 02:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Bartholomew Allerton
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bartholomew Allerton, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bartholomew Allerton seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bartholomew Allerton, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bartholomew Allerton
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bartholomew Allerton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Bartholomew Allerton. Thank you. TM 19:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names
Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names (more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.

Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.

Best wishes & thanks --Frze > talk  09:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Backlog template made by User:TheJJJunk
Best wishes --Frze > talk  04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

New REFBot
There is a suggestion on Bot requests for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

"Mainland China"
I have added my comments in the only talk I saw of this terminology at Talk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak. I saw discussion about why the use of "Mainland China" was used there. The terminology is simple and should be followed by the same list that List of sovereign nations follows. There is no controversy there and the manual of style around the terminology of countries and dependencies there should be the standard.  Krazytea  (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)