User talk:Jwalling

Message, e-mail, or chat
How to leave a message
 * 1) Login/create account
 * 2) Click the |new section|+| tab above, enter a subject/headline, and leave a message.

E-mail
 * wallingconsulting at gmail dot com

Internet Relay Chat For anyone who wants to chat with me,
 * Send email to schedule a chat, send a window of time
 * Open an IRC channel at irc.freenode.net (requires IRC client software)
 * At the message prompt, enter: /join #wallingconsulting
 * Or browse IRC://irc.freenode.net/wallingconsulting (requires browser plugin for IRC, e.g. Chatzilla)
 * Or browse HTTP://java.freenode.net/index.php?channel=wallingconsulting (requires Java client software)
 * If jwalling is not online, send another email
 * Get IRC help here http://www.irchelp.org/ or here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC
 * To get an IRC client:
 * try Chatzilla for FireFox
 * try Pidgin for multi-platform, multi-protocol application
 * try Mibbit a hosted IRC interface
 * or, compare the various IRC clients
 * I use Konversation on Ubuntu

Resources

 * Vandalism
 * Recent changes patrol
 * Administrator intervention against vandalism
 * Twinkle can be added via my preferences or via ''Special:MyPage/monobook.js
 * Twinkle gives non-administrators (and administrators, for that matter) three types of rollback functions. Other functions include a full library of speedy deletion functions, user warnings, pseudoautomagical reporting of vandals, and more.
 * Warnings and notices

jwalling (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Spam patrol: Cinco de Mayo

 * Cinco de Mayo
 * Followup

Response to followup

 * (copied from my talk page)
 * There is a few things you can do:
 * Revert and issue a warning on the talk page of the editor (anonymous or not). That will stop quite a few vandals from testing their luck further. Common practice is to use one of four level of templates to issue warnings, the fist level of warning is to be used when the editor can be assumed to have tested the edit feature of Wikipedia in good faith (in which case a templated welcome/help such as  might be useful as well), the second level when the intent to vandalize is obvious, the third and fourth level when the editor has already been warned by prior levels.
 * Report the editor on Administrator intervention against vandalism if they have already been issued level 4 warnings recently. See for instance how User talk:168.169.37.143 was blocked from editing Wikipedia after vandalizing Cinco de Mayo repeatedly last month.
 * If an article is the target of persistant vandalism from multiple editors (usually an anonymous user with a dynamic IP) in a short period of time, you can request page protection on Requests for page protection
 * Always check successive edits by different IPs before you revert, or you'll often revert to a version that was already vandalized (see below).
 * Put articles you notice are frequently vandalized in your watch list to keep an eye on them.


 * In this particular case, Cinco de Mayo is a low traffic and relatively minor article, good faith edits occur occasionally, it is vandalized fairly frequently but not frequently enough to warrant page protection. Revert & warn is the standard procedure here, not much else can be done. "Recent change patrollers" (WP:RCP) usually catch basic vandalism and do so within seconds with semi automated tools but they can't and don't catch everything.


 * Finally, what I did was of a different nature, an editor (User:EspanaViva) who was seemingly editing the article in good faith many months ago has apparently decided he didn't like any alteration to what he must think of "his" article, and is logging now and then reverting the article to "his" last version with a spurious edit summary regardless of what changes have been made. On November 10, he reverted to "his" version from August, and again a few days ago. It went under the radar in November and I only noticed in late December so I went back to a November version and reinserted a couple changes made since then. I simply reverted his January 7 edit (edit summary should read "Reverted EspanaViva's-reversal-to-a-months-old-version").


 * Incidently, I reverted to a vandalized version that had not been correctly reverted (due to successive vandalism from different IPs) and someone else fixed that.


 * That was quite a long answer. Short answer : Everyone is qualified, fix Wikipedia as you go or join the recent change patrol if you got too much time on your hands :)Equendil Talk 02:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Tweaked format: jwalling (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)