User talk:Jwanders

Welcome!
With family and carreer taking most (all?) of my time these days, I should be considered a dormant wikipedian and tend to check in on this page only once every few years.

Discussion here will be moved to User:Jwanders/Old_talk once it is no longer relevant.

Proposed deletion of Page 99 test
Hello, Jwanders. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Page 99 test, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Heya, I've added a few (admittedly mediocre) references and a note on the articles talk page. Mostly I think it deserves an article as I came to wikipedia to find out more about it.  If I did I figure others probably will someday too.  Also discovered that it was proposed by Ford Madox Ford, for whom we do have an article.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Woman Montage (2).jpg


The file File:Woman Montage (2).jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 10:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jwanders/ETNotice
User:Jwanders/ETNotice, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jwanders/ETNotice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Jwanders/ETNotice during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Women montage, non-nude.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Women montage, non-nude.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗ plicit  00:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dose from radioactive seeds


The article Dose from radioactive seeds has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No general notability. Also, WP:NOTHOWTO."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLonelyPather (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)