User talk:Jway04/Evaluate an Article

Jway04, as mentioned in class, students were supposed to evaluate an article related to the course content (so, anything related to Ancient Rome). Moreover, in the email I sent last Thursday, I wrote "As a reminder, I strongly recommend evaluating an article you are interested in working on improving (or have already chosen); this will make your future work, like the "annotated" bibliography, easier. Make sure you are only evaluating articles that are C-class and below, and that you are choosing Start- or Stub-class (or nonexistent!) articles to improve for the larger assignment." The Montreal Canadiens page is a 'Good Article' which is the highest rating a Wiki entry can receive. The reason I asked you to rate C-class and below is that you will have very little to critique on a 'Good Article.' Please make sure to follow the directions more closely in the future, or to ask me if you need any clarification on these assignments! Grade: 6/10, late submission -1. 5/10. Gardneca (talk) 19:15, 5 February 2020 (UTC)