User talk:Jwollbold

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Jwollbold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 13:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style


 * thanks for the welcome. at times, I'm rather active in the german wikipedia. here, until now, I only made smaller changes when looking for background information regarding my work projects. --Jwollbold (talk) 14:24, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

2012



 * Thank you - I wish you also joy and energy for wirting good articles!
 * Your non-ideologic, clear and rule-oriented style of discussion motivated me to edit more within the english Wikipedia. In the german community often fights about "Weltanschauung" prevail, or highly active authors pedantically defend their wordings or judgments of relevance. --Jwollbold (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Formal concept analysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extension (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mammalian target of rapamycin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMPK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Fixed now. --Jwollbold (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
Hi there. Lucky guess: I'm no expert on placing pics in articles, but lookind at the syntax instructions, thumb instead of mini sounded reasonable, particularly coming from w:de into w:en. And I'll try and give some thought to the neutrality issue; I'm not optimistic though, and it's a long way out of my sphere of expertise. I thought I'd already gone some ways towards balance by including the never signing statement from the 3 NATO nuclear powers. Best, Moscow Mule (talk) 02:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: What you removed from the lead is still in the article
Regarding your edit that removed certain information from the lead section, something is wrong here. The lead was only restating what was said in the body of the article. You said the information is wrong, but the article still says it's true, and cites a source to support the statement. Please see the first paragraph of the "Concept" section. —BarrelProof (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The concept section states: "... it was not intended to contain all of the legal and technical measures required to reach the point of elimination" and mentions subsequent negotiations. The final treaty texts goes one step further and defines a quite precise procedure for the elimination negotiations. The old text was not false, but now it is much more precise - I only summarized the provisions. --Jwollbold (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * PS: I will copy this discussion to the article discussion, later remove it here. Please answer there, if you like. --Jwollbold (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)