User talk:Jwr3gb/Borderline personality disorder

Peer Review
The information that you do have in your draft is pretty sparse, the wiki article for BPD is a large one to tackle because there is so much information in it. It can also be good that the article is so large because a lot probably needs updating. I would suggest reading through the entire article and taking notes on things that you may not understand or think could have information, that way you can have a visual representation of what needs work. You will be able to add much more to the article that way. I am impressed that you considered putting the perspective of people with the diagnosis in the article.

What you do have: Although I think that it is really cool that you considered putting perspective into the article I think that people have many opinions and perspectives on their disorder so it would be hard to get a wide range of them. Instead, you could do a common misconceptions portion which would add a lot of information because in the last few years, many people have learned about BPD and there are so many misconceptions about it.

Spelling:

persepctive = perspective

stigmatising = stigmatizing

Change regards to regard

Make sure to capitalize BPD throughout your draft.

What you could add/change: In the diagnosis section you could add more to the ICD-10/ICD-11 and explain what they are and why they are being used across the globe. With that you can also explain the differences between the ICD and the DSM because there are differences, it can get confusing why the United States uses DSM and the rest of the world primarily uses the ICD.

I would definitely add citations to the information that you put on your draft, it will help you keep information you are adding tied to its resources. You can add citations by highlighting specific information and clicking the quotation marks ", then pasting the link. ForeverExtraordinary (talk) 01:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)