User talk:Jwramsay

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Fraslet 21:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:IMG 2054edited.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IMG 2054edited.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Cambusnethan
I've removed some of the changes you made to the article as they were unencyclopedic or contained information that is not relevant. Wikipedia is not a complete list of everything and is not a tourist site, it is an encyclopedia, there is a great difference; an encyclopedia does not contain bus timetable information.

I also think you should be a bit more careful about the images you upload, in this particular case a list of the people in one image was just far too much information. Displaying images of children without express consent is frowned upon these days. Wikipedia is also not the place to advertise for memorabilia. Fraslet 10:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Please remember that articles are not your property, if you want to list this sort of information then you need to do so on your own private website, this is an encyclopedia. Fraslet 10:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The BB photo has the express permission of the parents as they all sign a consent form at the start of the session. Why are you suck an annoying person? ***

Please refrain from making personal comments, I would direct you at the WP:civil policy as you are certainly in breach of it. I do think you should reconsider your use of the photo as it is unlikely parents would have given their express permission for the photograph to be used in an online encyclopedia. Fraslet 10:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Well if you go back in time there are links to YOUTUBE videos that contain a lot more photographs from the BBs than that one, and funnily enough no-one complained then, either a parent, or a Wikipedia person. What stone have you slithered out from?

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Fraslet 10:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * If someone sees fit to mention a few bus routes that service Cambusnethan, what is wrong with adding links to the timetables for these busses? Saves having to "google" for the timetables, and makes wikipedia a better and primary source of information. Surely if this ain't allowed then the information about the bus services should be removed also. I do comment on content and then it gets removed. I have never commented on a contributor, merely some undoubted non local who is intent on destroying the contributions that I am making to this wikipedia website for the community of Cambusnethan.

Being a local is not a required qualification for editing wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, you may like to review what wikipedia is not. Fraslet 11:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)