User talk:Jwstang

July 2016
Your addition to Hugh "Shorty" Ray has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''


 * I have also removed the copyright violation you had put on this very page. Please read the above links carefully.'' Sitush (talk) 06:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

DEAR SITUSH: YOU WERE WELL ENOUGH TO ERASE MY BIOGRAPHICAL ADDITIONS TO THE HUGH L. RAY PAGE BUT WHEN I RESPOND I NOTE THAT YOU ARE NOT WELL. I HOPE YOU HAVE A SPEEDY RECOVERY. ALL OF THE MATERIAL IS SUBMITTED IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN OR COVERED UNDER MY COPYRIGHTED WORK, "HUGH L. RAY, THE NFL'S MR. EINSTEIN, Master Designer of the Modern Game." Published October 2014 Create Space and documented with 20 pages of notes. NONE OF THE INFORMATION I HAVE SUBMITTED IS IN VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME RAY'S WELL-DOCUMENTED BIOGRAPHICAL MATERIAL HAS BEEN TOTALLY ERASED-FIRSTS BY WIZARD LIZARD AND THEN BY YOU. YOU CAN GO TO HUGHRAYFOOTBALL.COM, HUGH L. RAY (PUBLIC FIGURE) FACEBOOK PAGE, GOOGLE PLUS AND THE INTERNET FOR ALL DOCUMENTATION AND PUBLISHED ARTICLES.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AFTER YOU ARE FEELING BETTER. YOU CAN REACH ME AT jstangeland1@yahoo.com Incidentally Sitush, I am a grandson of Hugh L. Ray and my family and I take his position in American Football history very seriously and will defend it at all costs.

Sincerely, James W. Stangeland

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jwstang. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 06:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Your recent editing history at Shorty Ray shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Minima ©  ( talk ) 14:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)