User talk:Jybernard

Welcome!
Hello, Jybernard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 18:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

EDEN cohort study moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, EDEN cohort study, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:EDEN cohort study has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:EDEN cohort study. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's wait for a few weeks, but meanwhile a few points. 1) A couple of months ago,  Onel 5969  requested "more citations from reliable, independent sources". I have added many reliable, independent sources, and there are now 20 references, which is far more than many articles of the same type. Saying "with very little improvement again" may sound insulting for the work I have done since the first review. 2) After revising the article in my draft space, I requested it to be reviewed by a third reviewer, but noone did so. After how long shall I republish the article? It's been two months! 3) this page exists in French language, with similar reliable sources, and there is no debate there on whether this article is suitable for Wikipedia; it simply is. 4) Here are a few articles on other cohort studies, which much less citations from reliable, independent sources: ALSPAC, Born in Bradford, Raine Study and Millennium Cohort Study. I do not see these articles being challenged with regard to citing more references, or from more reliable sources. I think at some point, it is not acceptable to have double standards, and it is legitimate to question how these double standards are being applied. Thank you. Jybernard (talk) 10:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EDEN cohort study (October 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EDEN cohort study and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EDEN cohort study, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EDEN_cohort_study Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EDEN_cohort_study reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:EDEN cohort study
Hello, Jybernard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EDEN cohort study, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:EDEN cohort study


Hello, Jybernard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EDEN cohort study".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)