User talk:Jybril

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dakota ~ 22:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ryulong 09:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Ryūlóng 09:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Prudence Halliwell, Melinda Warren, and List of Charmed family and friends, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- Huntster  T • @ • C 02:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Huntster  T • @ • C 05:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Final warning
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Lucky 6.9 02:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

PROO actors
Could you give a source that shows that the actors you are listing are portraying those characters? Right now, it is not confirmed, save for a few pictures that aren't clear.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Deena Jones
An editor has nominated Deena Jones, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

PROO
Please do not flood the article with trivia, unsourced speculation, and other information that we cannot support by an attributable source.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 21:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Block
I have blocked you indefinitely for basically ignoring anything that is put here and not discussing any of your edits, controversial or not, with any other editors. This also includes several unsourced edits, as well as recently inserting the entire lyrics of a song into an article as a form of original research. You may contest this block by using — Ryūlóng  ( 竜 龍 ) 03:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hundred-Year Winter


The article Hundred-Year Winter has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Hundred-Year Winter – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)